Trackback This Post | Subscribe to the comments through RSS Feed
The International Federation of Journalists (IFJ) says the Israeli ban on foreign journalists from entering Gaza to cover the conflict is a dangerous violation of press freedom that adds to “ignorance, uncertainty and fear” in the region.
The IFJ says that the presence of independent reporters on the ground is needed to ensure that there are no flagrant abuses of human rights by combatants.
The IFJ’s protest comes as the global humanitarian agency Human Rights Watch (HRW) called for rights monitors as well as journalists to be allowed into Gaza, a move that could help save lives.
“The Israeli ban on foreign news media from Gaza since December 27 raises concerns that there is a systematic attempt to prevent scrutiny of actions by the Israeli military,” said Aidan White, IFJ General Secretary. “The eyes of the world are on Gaza, but Israel is trying to censor the news by keeping the media at bay.”
The IFJ says that Israeli claims the ban was imposed because it cannot guarantee the safety of journalists is untenable.
“Few news people take this seriously given that Israel has already shown its contempt for international law by its targeted military strike on an unarmed television station at the outset of the conflict,” said White.
For the past two months, when the ceasefire between Israel and Hamas broke down, Israel has restricted access to Gaza for foreign journalists. None has been allowed entry since the current military campaign began. The world’s media are largely dependent upon coverage provided by local Palestinian freelance staff, many of whom are denied formal press accreditation by Israel and have no freedom to move in the region. Israeli journalists themselves are denied access to Gaza, say human rights groups, because of the government’s policy of prohibiting citizens from entering Gaza.
The IFJ is concerned that restriction of access and movement may contribute to unbalanced reporting as journalists are unable to report from all conflict-hit areas.
The IFJ is supporting efforts by the Jerusalem-based Foreign Correspondents Association to get journalists access to Gaza, but is insisting that there should be no controlled access organised and supervised by the Israeli authorities.
“It is not for one side to dictate who goes into the area and in what circumstances,” said White. “Journalists should be allowed to travel and work freely without monitoring by the military.”
For more information contact the IFJ at +32 2 235 2207
The IFJ represents over 600,000 journalists in 123 countries worldwide
Popularity: 1% [?]
By now, no one should be surprised that the White House is taking its usual, uneven and heavy-handed approach in reacting to the gargantuan Israeli shock-and-awe bombing of densely populated areas of the Gaza Strip.
A compliant American media is parroting Washington, solemnly ignoring the reality that while Hamas may have fired the first rockets into Israel, they were pushed into doing so by the Attica-like lockdown Israel slapped on Gaza months ago. Except on rare occasions, this keeps even food, fuel and medical supplies from reaching Palestinian civilians.
Yet in surfing foreign media, I find sharp criticism of the Israeli government and a detailing of the suffering being inflicted. Even Haaretz in Jerusalem is carrying accounts with more balance than we’re seeing in the US coverage.
Before I am deluged with right wing and neo-con e-hate or am accused of being the Jewish Clarence Thomas – a horrid and undeserved curse – let me say unequivocally that both sides are wrong.
Hamas will not improve conditions for its poor, starving people by lobbing homemade rockets into Southern Israel willy-nilly. Nor will Israel find peace for its people by staging massive air strikes into populated areas; indeed, all this strategy will produce is moderates in the Arab world going from trying to find a liveable solution to backing its Palestinian brothers.
Oh, and by the way, somebody might want to remind Olmert – and Washington – what happened the last time Israel thought it could destroy a Hamas faction sitting on its northern border. That folly didn’t turn out so well, as I recall.
“A million and a half human beings, most of them downcast and desperate refugees, live in the conditions of a giant jail, fertile ground for another round of bloodletting. The fact that Hamas may have gone too far with its rockets is not the justification of the Israeli policy for the past few decades, for which it justly merits an Iraqi shoe to the face.
“Israel embarked yesterday on yet another unnecessary, ill-fated war. On July 16, 2006, four days after the start of the Second Lebanon War, (we) wrote: ‘Every neighborhood has one, a loud-mouthed bully who shouldn’t be provoked into anger … Not that the bully’s not right - someone did harm him. But the reaction, what a reaction!’ Two and a half years later, these words repeat themselves, to our horror, with chilling precision. Within the span of a few hours on a Saturday afternoon, the IDF sowed death and destruction on a scale that the Qassam rockets never approached in all their years, and Operation ‘Cast Lead’ is only in its infancy.”
In Britain, The Independent writes,
“These bombs were launched by Israel, as we had known they would be. The world watched the situation simmer then boil over, but did nothing. There are some who believe that hell is divided into different classes. The ordinary people of Gaza have long been caught in the tormenting underworld. Now, if the world does not heed what has happened here, our situation will worsen. We will be trapped in the first class of hell.”
Here we go again, the above statement, “Yet another ill-fated war, unnecessary war”. Here is why the media is not allowed in. So I have heard, opinions are like— -everyones got one”. Always a bully in the school yard, or sand box, really? absolutely absurd, juvenile comment.
22 Arab countries, A BILLION and a HALF people, can´t keep their hands off of 7million, 300,000 people on a tiny strip of land called Israel.
That is why One Jewish life is worth hundreds. When they make prisoner exchanges it’s never one to one, it´s One Israeli for hundreds of prisoners, why doesn’t this formula work both ways. The blockade is to stop suicide bombers, the blockade is to stop arms shipments through tunnels etc. Open your eyes and see, not your subjective bias opinions.
Muslim brotherhood gave birth to all three, Hezbolla, Hamas, Al-Quaeda, started 30 years ago with the Ayatollahas of Iran screaming in 1979, “Death to America, Death to Israel” now you can include Moqtadar al-Sadr of Iraq. This is not new!!
Israel learned in the last war that journalists were not their friends and not even fair reporters. The reporters main objective was to find as many victims as possible to get film of even if they had to stage the filming. I am glad they banned journalists because they just get in the way and produce biased reports. I hope Israel goes through Gaza like they did in the 6 day war then takes out Iran. All this is long over due. Israel has had a lot more restraint than any other country I know of.
Once I played seal, I did not know how to get strong, someone told me that you must have seal cegel. He gave me some sealonline cegel.
Do you know Rom Gold? I like it.
My brother often go to the internet bar to buy Runes of Magic Gold and play it.
By Danny Schechter
As millions of homes are foreclosed upon, as unemployment grows and inflation mounts, it is time to understand the origins of the crisis and the need to fight for economic justice.
Written by veteran media critic and Emmy winner Rory O'Connor, Shock Jocks features unsparing profiles of the ten worst conservative radio talkers in America, including Michael Savage, Bill O' Reilly, Rush Limbaugh, Don Imus and the rest.