Trackback This Post | Subscribe to the comments through RSS Feed
WASHINGTON (AP) — Even if all goes smoothly, next February’s digital television shift is likely to generate hundreds of thousands of complaints from television viewers around the country.
A major problem during a test run in Wilmington, N.C., was the inability of over-the-air viewers to receive new digital signals, according to figures collected after the test.
Commercial broadcasters in the North Carolina city volunteered to cease analog programming on Sept. 8, well before the rest of the nation. Of the 1,828 people who complained to the Federal Communications Commission in the first five days, slightly more than half were unable to tune in one or more channels.
All full-power television stations must turn off their analog signals by Feb. 18. Viewers who receive programming through an antenna and do not own newer-model digital TV sets by the time of the changeover must buy a converter box. The government is providing two $40 coupons per household to help defray the cost.
The largest number of calls to the FCC from Wilmington were from viewers of the NBC affiliate, WECT-TV. That station’s analog broadcast covers far more ground than its digital signal, meaning some viewers could watch that channel before the switchover but not afterward. A total of 553 complaints were attributed to that issue.
FCC Chairman Kevin Martin said a smaller digital footprint may affect as many as 15 percent of television markets in the U.S.
The agency is still calculating what impact that may have nationwide.
Some Wilmington callers were able to watch NBC programming from another market. But an undetermined number could not, an issue generating concern at the FCC and Congress.
It’s not certain what — if anything — the FCC or broadcasters can do for these viewers, short of recommending that they buy a bigger antenna.
Martin told members of the Senate Commerce, Science and Transportation Committee Tuesday that a possible solution would be for broadcasters to erect special “repeater” antennas to expand their reach.
“Our goal is to ensure that all viewers in the Wilmington area and the country have access to the same television signals that they did prior to the transition,” he said.
Nielsen Media Research said as of July that there are about 13.4 million television households in the U.S. that receive their programming over the air only, about 12 percent of all homes with TVs. In Wilmington, the total is 15,110, or 8.4 percent.
If the Wilmington complaint rate were applied nationally, there would be more than 1.1 million calls to the FCC in the first five days after the change.
Or not.
Wilmington broadcasters transmitted an informational crawl over an analog signal that included the hot line number. Federal law makes no such allowances after Feb. 17 — all full-power analog signals must cease, so viewers may not know where to turn with problems.
Committee Chairman Sen. Daniel Inouye, D-Hawaii, said he was concerned that “even with a Herculean investment of time and resources” in Wilmington, there was still a large number of calls.
“On a national level, this may translate to millions of calls,” he said. “Unless more is done, Feb. 17, and 18, and 19 will be very long days indeed.”
There are also concerns that Wilmington was not representative. Citizens were subjected to an intense public education campaign. The terrain is relatively flat, and as a percentage, fewer viewers rely on over-the-air broadcasting than the nation as a whole.
Democratic FCC Commissioner Michael Copps, who recommended the test-market idea, wants the agency to conduct more field tests, ramp up the agency’s call center and find a way to broadcast an analog message to consumers following the transition.
On the Net:
* To apply for a coupon for a converter box: http://www.dtv2009.gov
* Federal Communications Commission: http://www.fcc.gov
– By JOHN DUNBAR
Popularity: 2% [?]
The DTV transition is a digital tornado that will hit hundreds or thousands of rural fringe areas like Hunterdon County , NJ. Teletruth just completed a pilot study of Hunterdon OTA households by “field testing” converter boxes and found that a significant number of Hunterdon’s over-the-air TV sets will go dark or lose most of their major broadcast channels. With a population around 130,000 households, over 4,000 coupons have been ordered with expired coupons costing consumers over $50,000 as of the second week in September.
One of the startling findings of the field study was that the digital signal from New York City broadcasters could not be viewed by anyone. This is alarming since the FCC considers Hunterdon County to be part of the NY MSA. For most study participants, the analog signals from NY were good and some were snowy but very watchable.
I call upon the FCC to come to Hunterdon County for a public town hall meeting and to conduct real-world field testing. Hunterdon should be declared a community “at-risk” as the digital TV tornado will decimate the entire Hunterdon over-the-air community on February 17, 2009.
Teletruth has long recognized the antenna and wiring issues and it is unforgiveable that the FCC and NTIA have known about these technical issues but did nothing to alert consumers and more importantly, develop a program that covered all these additional costs.
I attended the DTV hearing in DC this week and Chairman Martin is mis-representing the Wilmington statistics. The number of complaints received is reached 16% as more and more people continue to call the FCC callcenter. Mr. Martin has decided to throw the rest of the country to the wolves by relying on the industry to help consumers for the remaining 100 days before the tornado hits.
Our pilot study can be viewed by visiting www.teletruth.org.
Tom Allibone
Director of Audits, Teletruth
When I received my coupon cards for DTV I attempted to buy one at Walmart. It was sold out. I did get a DTV box from Radio Shack and paid an extra $10.00. By the time Walmart had enough converters, my other coupon had expired. This does not mean that I believe the government is to blame but I believe lots of people will lose the freedom to receive television without paying for it, i.e. cable or satellite. The new information that a digital signal may not have enough power to reach those in rural areas is doubly disturbing. This will affect me and it will be worth my effort to seek accountability. In my opinion, the DTV law should be repealed. Currently I have rabbit ears that can amplify the analogue signals I receive. It looks like I will lose over half of the eight channels I receive now. I suppose I will be able to find out from each broadcaster which channels are already digital and then connect my converter box and test the signal.
By the way, hooking up the converter box is not simple, yet I am sure every family has someone clever enough to do this. My mom, who would have turned 88 this year, would not have had a clue about all of this. Fortunately she always subscribed to cablevision so she would have been fine.
I am concerned about this because i have been told that even if I buy the converter or a new flat screen TV i still have to buy a monthly service, that is, pay cable if i want to watch TV. Is this true?
I have already gone through the expance of buying the new TV. I would not be able to pay a monthly cable service on my fixed income. Does this mean i will not watch TV come Feb 2009?
Is this going to happen to many of us in the USA?

By Danny Schechter
As millions of homes are foreclosed upon, as unemployment grows and inflation mounts, it is time to understand the origins of the crisis and the need to fight for economic justice.
Written by veteran media critic and Emmy winner Rory O'Connor, Shock Jocks features unsparing profiles of the ten worst conservative radio talkers in America, including Michael Savage, Bill O' Reilly, Rush Limbaugh, Don Imus and the rest.