Trackback This Post | Subscribe to the comments through RSS Feed
Pretoria, South Africa: “There is no crisis”, a recently common term ascribed to Government’s reaction to what media considers ‘crisis issues’. The term made headlines in the wake of the Zimbabwean elections and somehow have been associated to a range of other challenges facing South Africa and its Government.
Crime, Zimbabwe, Xenophobia, Energy, Water, all easily summed-up under one category of “there is no crisis”. Even though Government’s message on all these issues varies to a great extent, “there is no crisis” has become a convenient term in the wake of the nation wide rolling blackouts at the start of 2008.
“We are taking it as a crisis - government is going to take charge of the situation and make sure a solution is found,” Themba Maseko 22/01/2008
The acknowledgement that media had been pushing for had finally been made after more than a thousand articles on Energy at the start of 2008 in opinion leading SA media. The final acknowledgement of a crisis situation left many asking, what will be next?
For the moment steering clear of the top negative issues in the South African media, namely Crime and Zimbabwe, what warning signs can media offer to this question of “Is water the next crisis?”.
“I can categorically say that we are not facing a water crisis, or a water-contamination crisis,” Minister of Water Affairs Lindiwe Hendricks 06/03/2008
Looking at the visibility of Water issues in comparison to Energy issues, Minister Hendricks could be believed, but in the light of distrust in the recently popularized term “there is no crisis”, Water issues warrant a second look.
Even though Water issues receive substantially less coverage in the media in comparison to energy, it has yielded far more scrutiny.
In summary, since 2004, there have been a growing number of reports on water contamination, shortages, poor infrastructure and distribution. What further raises concern is that this trend was also reflected by Energy issues, but to a lesser negative degree.
Looking at more recent coverage, media’s ‘alarm bells’ started ringing louder in 2007 following the large scale Diarrhoea outbreak in Mpumalanga. In February 2008, a report compiled by the NNR highlighted their concern that the water supply in South Africa is of questionable safety and quality. This further coincided with a report that was released by The Sunday Times on Feb 3, 2008 stated that 43% of our dams are problematic in terms of safety and require repair. Moreover, there had been several reports on the contamination of water sources in the Johannesburg area. The concern was further heightened on a consumer level after a report published by Business Times on March 9, 2008, indicated that Eskom may be facing a water crisis. Reports also surfaced that various areas were said to require attention after several streams, dams and tap water sources were found to be allegedly contaminated with various metals and toxins due to mining waste. Next, on April 22, 2008 Mail & Guardian reported on the deaths of babies in the Eastern Cape due to alleged water contamination continued the barrage of highly negative examples of water associated problems. But does the political debate reflect the severity of the situation?
There exist similarities in the patterns of government communication on Water issues compared to their communication on Energy issues prior to 2008. There are, however, differences in the manner non-governmental sources are approaching the issues.
For Water issues there are much stronger criticism coming from political and societal sources. Governmental sources do acknowledge some of the criticism, but offsets this with a stronger measure of positive information. The most visible difference is,
however, the level of input from journalists themselves. While journalists’ input on Energy issues were almost four times as much as that of the next closest source, their input on Water issues was only slightly higher than the next top source.
In Summary
Although Water issues are not as visible as Energy issues they attract stronger negative coverage. Many recent reports on water problems are surfacing and raising concern as South African society struggles to put faith in the “no crisis” sentiment.
What further raises this concern is the continual decreasing rating attributed to Water issues which were also reflected by in the media in reports on Energy issues over the last few years. Lastly there is a noticeable difference in the extent of input from journalists on Water issues in comparison to Energy issues. With all the signs in the media pointing towards a looming large scale water crisis, the question therefore is not so much whether there will be a water crisis, but rather whether journalists can further heighten the profile of Water issues to help raise awareness of the problem before it reaches a crisis proportions. Had journalists been previously often accused of not being ‘at the pulse of their readers’, it now seems that the media have awoken to some of the duties they have: raising an issue and setting the agenda for others to respond.
Methodology
These findings are based on 1,619 reports focused on Water issues, and 5,914 reports focused on Energy issue, from January 2002 to April 2008.. The media set include: Afrikaans News (SABC), Beeld, Business Day, Business Report, Business Times, City Press, English News (SABC), E-TV News, Financial Mail, FinWeek, Mail & Guardian, Rapport, SABC 3: Africa News Update, SABC 3: News @ 10, SABC 3: News @ One, Sake, Sake Rapport, Saturday Star, Sotho News (SABC), Sowetan, Summit TV, Sunday Independent, Sunday Sun, Sunday World, The Star, The Sunday Times
Media Contacts:
Wadim Schreiner: MD Media Tenor SA (wn.schreiner@mediatenor.co.za)
Media Tenor South Africa
Tel: (012) 346 6422
Popularity: 1% [?]
The water crisis has been developing for years now with virtually no serious treatment in any of the world’s news media organizations. It is already a full fledged crisis in nearly every major country in the world, the U.S. included. The major news media seem to be able to focus on only one thing at a time, kind of like a tiger with a chair leg. Further, these same self congratulating media can only work on stories that present themselves in a nice little package. This is why, for example, attacks on Obama as a flip-flopper become the only story covered for days, but a story like the water crisis which requires doing some real research are ignored until they fall in the laps of reporters.
I live in the American Desert and there is a water crisis here in Eastern Colorado and it is not reported here. The Rocky Mountain News will mention it from time to time, last some several hundred wells ran dry in MacMansions but the real estate interests don’t like that sort news.
Not only is unbridled growth sucking the aquifers dry but privatizing and municipal buying of water and drying rural areas bringing hardship but on going drought is taking it’s toll.
The problem is denial by press and politicians. Here as well as Africa they will take the payoffs, not report and then wait till people are dying in the street to tell the truth.
Concerns over a water crisis shouldn’t even be in the same category as concerns over an energy crisis. True, an energy crisis could change our whole way of life (and is doing so), but a water crisis can wipe out whole countries within weeks. With one, we may not be able to drive our automobiles or stay warm or cool enough. But with the other, we may all die!!! I live in Atlanta, Georgia, and we have been in the middle of a water crisis for a few years now, and last year it became critical. Unfortunately, our leaders in this State refuse to acknowledge that rampant development has had any effect on our water shortage (which, of course, it has – it’s been the number one influence). So, until politicians are more concerned with public health than they are with their own wallets, I refuse to conserve water to the extent they’ve asked us to conserve. I’ve often wondered why anyone would want to serve in public office, but I now realize that 90% of those who serve in public office do so for their own personal gain. Many effect legislation that will affect the particular industry they came from and intend to return to, irregardless of how detrimental is will be to the rest of us…….
Excellent work! “There IS a crisis”
By Danny Schechter
As millions of homes are foreclosed upon, as unemployment grows and inflation mounts, it is time to understand the origins of the crisis and the need to fight for economic justice.
Written by veteran media critic and Emmy winner Rory O'Connor, Shock Jocks features unsparing profiles of the ten worst conservative radio talkers in America, including Michael Savage, Bill O' Reilly, Rush Limbaugh, Don Imus and the rest.