<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><!-- generator="wordpress/2.0.5" -->
<rss version="2.0" 
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/">
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Catching Predators is Good; Economic Justice is Better</title>
	<link>http://www.mediachannel.org/wordpress/2008/06/23/catching-predators-is-good-economic-justice-is-better/</link>
	<description>As The Media Watches The World, We Watch The Media</description>
	<pubDate>Thu, 08 Jan 2009 01:02:44 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.0.5</generator>

	<item>
		<title>by: Payday Loan Advocate</title>
		<link>http://www.mediachannel.org/wordpress/2008/06/23/catching-predators-is-good-economic-justice-is-better/#comment-23504</link>
		<pubDate>Wed, 15 Oct 2008 13:21:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.mediachannel.org/wordpress/2008/06/23/catching-predators-is-good-economic-justice-is-better/#comment-23504</guid>
					<description>Last Tuesday, October 7th, the second presidential debate that took place in Belmont University in Nashville attracted over 60 million viewers. Instead of coming to a more firm deliberation on how to improve the well-being of the United States and all of the American citizens who inhabit it, more questions have raised about how exactly these presidential candidates intend to better our obliterated economy. Frequent questions asked about the $700 billion Wall Street bailout were left unanswered. People are upset and even fear that it would not work and are in search of reassurance and a solution. It seems like their main focus is basically to criticize each other in hopes of rounding up a larger number of followers than the other. Their proposed intentions are based on completely irrelevant issues. Let’s take Barak Obama’s stance on payday advance lenders for an instance. He categorized them as “predatory lending”- effectively sanctioning the industry. This is not an issue that is downheartedly affecting our economy. As the real economic problems are ignored, they spend more time finding and using the pettiest affairs to add spice to the banking production.

Post Courtesy of Personal Money Store
Professional Blogging Team
Feed Back:  1-866-641-3406
Home: http://personalmoneystore.com/NoFaxPaydayLoans.html
Blog: http://personalmoneystore.com/moneyblog/</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Last Tuesday, October 7th, the second presidential debate that took place in Belmont University in Nashville attracted over 60 million viewers. Instead of coming to a more firm deliberation on how to improve the well-being of the United States and all of the American citizens who inhabit it, more questions have raised about how exactly these presidential candidates intend to better our obliterated economy. Frequent questions asked about the $700 billion Wall Street bailout were left unanswered. People are upset and even fear that it would not work and are in search of reassurance and a solution. It seems like their main focus is basically to criticize each other in hopes of rounding up a larger number of followers than the other. Their proposed intentions are based on completely irrelevant issues. Let’s take Barak Obama’s stance on payday advance lenders for an instance. He categorized them as “predatory lending”- effectively sanctioning the industry. This is not an issue that is downheartedly affecting our economy. As the real economic problems are ignored, they spend more time finding and using the pettiest affairs to add spice to the banking production.</p>
<p>Post Courtesy of Personal Money Store<br />
Professional Blogging Team<br />
Feed Back:  1-866-641-3406<br />
Home: <a href="http://personalmoneystore.com/NoFaxPaydayLoans.html" rel="nofollow">http://personalmoneystore.com/NoFaxPaydayLoans.html</a><br />
Blog: <a href="http://personalmoneystore.com/moneyblog/" rel="nofollow">http://personalmoneystore.com/moneyblog/</a>
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: Carol in Colorado</title>
		<link>http://www.mediachannel.org/wordpress/2008/06/23/catching-predators-is-good-economic-justice-is-better/#comment-19500</link>
		<pubDate>Thu, 26 Jun 2008 12:50:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.mediachannel.org/wordpress/2008/06/23/catching-predators-is-good-economic-justice-is-better/#comment-19500</guid>
					<description>"Treasury Secretary Paulson is using the crisis as a cover to call for more power to the Federal Reserve Bank, which is actually an entity run by private banks in their own interest."

That's not so.  At least it's not necessarily so.  The Federal Reserve Bank is governed by a committee of people appointed by the president (with consent of the Senate) to non-renewable 14 year terms. (So it's highly unlikely that all of them would ever have been appointed by the same president.)  It is funded by private banks, which are required by law to invest in it, but it is Not run by them.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;Treasury Secretary Paulson is using the crisis as a cover to call for more power to the Federal Reserve Bank, which is actually an entity run by private banks in their own interest.&#8221;</p>
<p>That&#8217;s not so.  At least it&#8217;s not necessarily so.  The Federal Reserve Bank is governed by a committee of people appointed by the president (with consent of the Senate) to non-renewable 14 year terms. (So it&#8217;s highly unlikely that all of them would ever have been appointed by the same president.)  It is funded by private banks, which are required by law to invest in it, but it is Not run by them.
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: Rick</title>
		<link>http://www.mediachannel.org/wordpress/2008/06/23/catching-predators-is-good-economic-justice-is-better/#comment-19331</link>
		<pubDate>Tue, 24 Jun 2008 16:21:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.mediachannel.org/wordpress/2008/06/23/catching-predators-is-good-economic-justice-is-better/#comment-19331</guid>
					<description>Excellent article. 

The policies this nation, both politically and economically, have followed for the past 40+ years, could have had no different result. 

The tech bubble could only be predicted in that a sector to create a bubble had to be found. It just so happened a few years earlier, a few kids in a garage wrote software code that enabled small, affordable machines to increase the productivity of the white collar worker. With creation of financing (debt), these new machines could be offered to the average consumer. From there it took off.

When saturation was reached, the effectiveness of the financing (debt) used for expansion of product and services disappeared. No growth  meant no new money for more expansion, without expansion, revenues would now rely on the return on principal, just like bonds. The feeding frenzy stopped, as money wanted and needed the quicker returns to keep Wall Street with equal levels of fees (profits). Thus, with lesser fees came lesser profits, and with lesser profits came lesser value to stock price.

Pretty simple. Lesson learned? uh, no. 

So, as a replacement, in Jan. 2001, the Fed dropped interest rates. This started, purposely, another bubble.

Wall Street, having learned a little, knew this would end one day. Here's the point: They willfully created risky, speculative, securitized creative financial vehicles to generate fees, in a 'get as much as you can before it blows' mentality. 

When the inflow of loans to securitize did not meet the demand THEY created for these financial vehicles, they encouraged lowering, and subsequently elimination, of sound loan guidelines. 

This, in turn, encouraged a culture of similar attitude involving everyone in the real estate market. From real estate agents, to originators, to underwriters to title companies. 

Not every single person in this arena happily participated. There are many who tried to blow whistles. They usually were fired or told to shut up or be fired, or were denied referrals.

But these people were the exceptions to the rule. Most people just turned a blind eye, believing they had the right to make the money too. It didn't matter if the system was being put at risk due to loans being given people who might not be able to pay them back. The moral breakdown was blatant, widespread and pervasive. It was a get as much as you can mentality.

The question I can't shake - A radical change is coming for how America is governed. In 50 years will we be one North American government with the Amero, or is there enough foment to have a "tea party' and all that follows?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Excellent article. </p>
<p>The policies this nation, both politically and economically, have followed for the past 40+ years, could have had no different result. </p>
<p>The tech bubble could only be predicted in that a sector to create a bubble had to be found. It just so happened a few years earlier, a few kids in a garage wrote software code that enabled small, affordable machines to increase the productivity of the white collar worker. With creation of financing (debt), these new machines could be offered to the average consumer. From there it took off.</p>
<p>When saturation was reached, the effectiveness of the financing (debt) used for expansion of product and services disappeared. No growth  meant no new money for more expansion, without expansion, revenues would now rely on the return on principal, just like bonds. The feeding frenzy stopped, as money wanted and needed the quicker returns to keep Wall Street with equal levels of fees (profits). Thus, with lesser fees came lesser profits, and with lesser profits came lesser value to stock price.</p>
<p>Pretty simple. Lesson learned? uh, no. </p>
<p>So, as a replacement, in Jan. 2001, the Fed dropped interest rates. This started, purposely, another bubble.</p>
<p>Wall Street, having learned a little, knew this would end one day. Here&#8217;s the point: They willfully created risky, speculative, securitized creative financial vehicles to generate fees, in a &#8216;get as much as you can before it blows&#8217; mentality. </p>
<p>When the inflow of loans to securitize did not meet the demand THEY created for these financial vehicles, they encouraged lowering, and subsequently elimination, of sound loan guidelines. </p>
<p>This, in turn, encouraged a culture of similar attitude involving everyone in the real estate market. From real estate agents, to originators, to underwriters to title companies. </p>
<p>Not every single person in this arena happily participated. There are many who tried to blow whistles. They usually were fired or told to shut up or be fired, or were denied referrals.</p>
<p>But these people were the exceptions to the rule. Most people just turned a blind eye, believing they had the right to make the money too. It didn&#8217;t matter if the system was being put at risk due to loans being given people who might not be able to pay them back. The moral breakdown was blatant, widespread and pervasive. It was a get as much as you can mentality.</p>
<p>The question I can&#8217;t shake - A radical change is coming for how America is governed. In 50 years will we be one North American government with the Amero, or is there enough foment to have a &#8220;tea party&#8217; and all that follows?
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: Jariah</title>
		<link>http://www.mediachannel.org/wordpress/2008/06/23/catching-predators-is-good-economic-justice-is-better/#comment-19307</link>
		<pubDate>Tue, 24 Jun 2008 08:10:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.mediachannel.org/wordpress/2008/06/23/catching-predators-is-good-economic-justice-is-better/#comment-19307</guid>
					<description>"A fool and his money are soon parted."

The Fed can do whatever they want and the tax paying fools don't even have a clue on how they screw us all.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;A fool and his money are soon parted.&#8221;</p>
<p>The Fed can do whatever they want and the tax paying fools don&#8217;t even have a clue on how they screw us all.
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: Richard Neva</title>
		<link>http://www.mediachannel.org/wordpress/2008/06/23/catching-predators-is-good-economic-justice-is-better/#comment-19279</link>
		<pubDate>Tue, 24 Jun 2008 01:46:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.mediachannel.org/wordpress/2008/06/23/catching-predators-is-good-economic-justice-is-better/#comment-19279</guid>
					<description>Whatever.  As long as it all kills capitalism and brings on a Depression is has to be good.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Whatever.  As long as it all kills capitalism and brings on a Depression is has to be good.
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: dave</title>
		<link>http://www.mediachannel.org/wordpress/2008/06/23/catching-predators-is-good-economic-justice-is-better/#comment-19273</link>
		<pubDate>Tue, 24 Jun 2008 00:13:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.mediachannel.org/wordpress/2008/06/23/catching-predators-is-good-economic-justice-is-better/#comment-19273</guid>
					<description>Eisenhower basically did warn us about this situation in his farewell address. This problem started 40 years ago when we broke the bank over the Vietnam war. The following run on the dollar pushed Nixon to drop the gold standard.

We've been printing money ever since. And when that wasn't enough we sold our manufacturing base to raise even more capital.

Regulation wouldn't have prevented the housing crisis. This game was over at least by the '97 asian contagion, or was it LTCM?, or Y2k, or the tech crash? Some say its been a house of cards since the '87 crash.

We all lived a life style built on a lie. But you can only lie for so long until your luck runs out. Lolz at regulation being the problem.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Eisenhower basically did warn us about this situation in his farewell address. This problem started 40 years ago when we broke the bank over the Vietnam war. The following run on the dollar pushed Nixon to drop the gold standard.</p>
<p>We&#8217;ve been printing money ever since. And when that wasn&#8217;t enough we sold our manufacturing base to raise even more capital.</p>
<p>Regulation wouldn&#8217;t have prevented the housing crisis. This game was over at least by the &#8216;97 asian contagion, or was it LTCM?, or Y2k, or the tech crash? Some say its been a house of cards since the &#8216;87 crash.</p>
<p>We all lived a life style built on a lie. But you can only lie for so long until your luck runs out. Lolz at regulation being the problem.
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: Robert Tapia</title>
		<link>http://www.mediachannel.org/wordpress/2008/06/23/catching-predators-is-good-economic-justice-is-better/#comment-19272</link>
		<pubDate>Tue, 24 Jun 2008 00:10:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.mediachannel.org/wordpress/2008/06/23/catching-predators-is-good-economic-justice-is-better/#comment-19272</guid>
					<description>hear hear...
for public safety in housing please visit our websites: http://avenue-s.us and http://avenue-s.info
subversion of rural innocence</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>hear hear&#8230;<br />
for public safety in housing please visit our websites: <a href="http://avenue-s.us" rel="nofollow">http://avenue-s.us</a> and <a href="http://avenue-s.info" rel="nofollow">http://avenue-s.info</a><br />
subversion of rural innocence
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: Cindy</title>
		<link>http://www.mediachannel.org/wordpress/2008/06/23/catching-predators-is-good-economic-justice-is-better/#comment-19264</link>
		<pubDate>Mon, 23 Jun 2008 20:18:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.mediachannel.org/wordpress/2008/06/23/catching-predators-is-good-economic-justice-is-better/#comment-19264</guid>
					<description>Our organization was among others who tried to get law enforcement to DO something about the fraud going on in homebuilding and lending, years ago.  We were among those who also warned that if left unchecked, these problems could result in damage to the U.S. economy.  When mere consumers were losing everything law enforcement either couldn't or wouldn't do much to stop the crimes.  In fact, most consumers were told, "It's a civil matter, get a lawyer and sue!"  But when banks and investors got burned as the scams spun out of control, suddenly it's "mortgage fraud" and the FBI is involved.  This whole problem could've been stopped years ago had anyone taken consumer complaints seriously.  It's good to see somethign is finally being done but this is truly the tip of the iceberg.  Many in the indsustry are contributing to this problem, and many should go to jail.  Instead, their lobbyists are crying for a government handout and trying to package it as being "for the homeowners."  And instead, some big companies have paid fines to HUD without admitting wrong doing, fines that are meaningless to the CEO's who are still raking in millions a year even as their companies fail. --C.S., National Secretary, Homeowners Against Deficient Dwellings</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Our organization was among others who tried to get law enforcement to DO something about the fraud going on in homebuilding and lending, years ago.  We were among those who also warned that if left unchecked, these problems could result in damage to the U.S. economy.  When mere consumers were losing everything law enforcement either couldn&#8217;t or wouldn&#8217;t do much to stop the crimes.  In fact, most consumers were told, &#8220;It&#8217;s a civil matter, get a lawyer and sue!&#8221;  But when banks and investors got burned as the scams spun out of control, suddenly it&#8217;s &#8220;mortgage fraud&#8221; and the FBI is involved.  This whole problem could&#8217;ve been stopped years ago had anyone taken consumer complaints seriously.  It&#8217;s good to see somethign is finally being done but this is truly the tip of the iceberg.  Many in the indsustry are contributing to this problem, and many should go to jail.  Instead, their lobbyists are crying for a government handout and trying to package it as being &#8220;for the homeowners.&#8221;  And instead, some big companies have paid fines to HUD without admitting wrong doing, fines that are meaningless to the CEO&#8217;s who are still raking in millions a year even as their companies fail. &#8211;C.S., National Secretary, Homeowners Against Deficient Dwellings
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
</channel>
</rss>
