Catching Predators is Good; Economic Justice is Better

Is the FBI’s Crackdown on Mortgage Crime Wave Too Little Too Late?

Stephen Colbert has a popular feature in his Comedy Channel rants of the day. He calls it “The Word” (Rappers used to just say “word.”) explaining how language has different meanings. Consider the word, “predator.”

My online dictionary offers two meanings, one for the animal world and one for ours:

predator | predeter|
noun: an animal that naturally preys on others: wolves are major predators of rodents
figurative: a rapacious, exploitative person or group: her wealth made her vulnerable to predators. (Note: poverty also can make one vulnerable.)

In popular usage there are two others. One references companies and scammers who engage in predatory lending. They are behind the subprime loans that took advantage of so many people resulting in the collapse of our markets and a threat to the global economy. Despite its pervasive presence, this type of predatory behavior does not find its way into the news much because of its connotation of criminality.

The other use is associated with men who use the Internet to lure young people into sex. No one really knows how pervasive the practice is - most of the figures have been hyped and exaggerated. Yet, because of its salaciousness, it has been the subject of a popular prime time TV segment, NBC’s “To Catch A Predator,” which has made parents fearful that legions of perverts are lurking online to solicit their kids. When the Columbia Journalism Review analyzed the show, they found it to be exploitative, factually inaccurate and a disservice. They showed how it inflated a problem for the sake of entertainment, as opposed to reporting one as news.

This is an example of how TV news organizations sensationalize to generate ratings while ignoring a far uglier and more pervasive reality by the same name confronting many more people who are loosing their homes and their hope.

Now that the Justice Department and FBI are indicting and rounding up this type of predator, the criminal nature of this problem has finally been validated. Last week, two former hedge fund managers at Bear Sterns were busted for defrauding investors to the tune of a billion dollars. Another 400 scammers were arrested in “Operation Malicious Mortgage,” an FBI run investigation staffed by 180 agents serving 40 taskforces working more than 1200 cases.

So far, no TV network has announced a special series on these corporate predators, but the New York Times business section has become a subcrime scene with pictures of the perps. There have been reports about an executve for a Swiss Bank that encouraged Americans to violate the law by moving money illicitly into off shore accounts, as well as a profile of another hedge fund crook, now on the run, chased by US marshals as he tries to escape a jail sentence. The Times even published a Wanted poster.

The investigation of this white-collar crime wave is a bit late since trillions have already been lost. Legal experts say that the top dogs may walk because of the difficulties of proving that what they did was a crime.

Historian Carolyn Baker who follows the economic crisis for her Truth to Power site believes:

“History will prove that the number of people busted for this is only a drop in the bucket compared to the number involved in nationwide blatant fraud and theft which created the largest mortgage meltdown in the history of the world. A few bad apples? Get a clue! The scam was rampant and epdemic.”

Aaron Krowne who edits the indispensable insider Ml-implode.com mortgage site concurs:

“It’s not like the current execs would have done anything different; this is all just plausible deniability and saving face, so that angry investors (the general public — including aunt millie’s pension fund) who are being diluted to oblivion won’t be able to say ‘nothing is being done.’”

What’s worse, while these arrests capture the headlines, the industry is busy lobbying Congress to back off on regulations of its latest bubble-blowing exercise. Reported the Washington Post:

“Wall Street banks and other large financial institutions have begun putting intense pressure on Congress to hold off on legislation that would curtail their highly profitable trading in oil contracts — an activity increasingly blamed by lawmakers for driving up prices to record levels.”

Yes, there are criminal practices underway, but they are far more insidious and invisible than most people realize. Example: Treasury Secretary Paulson is using the crisis as a cover to call for more power to the Federal Reserve Bank, which is actually an entity run by private banks in their own interest. (The Bank itself was created in response to a manufactured banking crisis in 1907.) Committee chairman in Congress are not rushing to discuss his proposals reportedly, in part, because Paulson has done so little about the worsening foreclosure problem.

Read some history, like lawyer Ellen Brown’s well-documented book, The Web of Debt, and you will see that a battle between financial capital and the public interest over who controls our money supply has been a constant over the decades. The book remind us that Former Fed Chairman Alan Greenspan, who many now blame for allowing the housing bubble to burst, was on the board of JP Morgan before joining the Fed. It was the Fed, of course, which recently bailed out Bear Stearns by giving Morgan $30 billion to buy the company. Morgan boasted last week in an unseemly way about what a bargain it got.

Americans have been fighting for economic justice from before there was an America. The colonists opposed taxation without representation. They rose up against the kind of debt that is enslaving so many of us now and seems to be leading to a total economic breakdown.

If President Dwight David Eisenhower was alive today, he might have warned us of another complex, as well as the military-industrial behomoth, that is threatening our economic well-being as a nation. Imagine if his famous farewell address was updated to sound like this:

“In the councils of government, we must guard against the acquisition of unwarranted influence, whether sought or unsought, by the financialization of America and its CREDIT AND DEBT complex. The potential for the disastrous rise of misplaced power exists and will persist.

We must never let the weight of this combination endanger our liberties or democratic processes. We should take nothing for granted. Only an alert and knowledgeable citizenry can compel the proper meshing of our FINANCIAL SYSTEM and ECONOMIC JUSTICE so that security and liberty may prosper together.”

– MediaChannel.org’s News Dissector Danny Schechter directed the film IN DEBT WE TRUST (InDebtWeTrust.org). He has now written PLUNDER, an investigation of our economic calamity, out soon from Cosimo. Comments to Dissector@mediachannel.org

Popularity: 2% [?]

hear hear…
for public safety in housing please visit our websites: http://avenue-s.us and http://avenue-s.info
subversion of rural innocence

Whatever. As long as it all kills capitalism and brings on a Depression is has to be good.

Excellent article.

The policies this nation, both politically and economically, have followed for the past 40+ years, could have had no different result.

The tech bubble could only be predicted in that a sector to create a bubble had to be found. It just so happened a few years earlier, a few kids in a garage wrote software code that enabled small, affordable machines to increase the productivity of the white collar worker. With creation of financing (debt), these new machines could be offered to the average consumer. From there it took off.

When saturation was reached, the effectiveness of the financing (debt) used for expansion of product and services disappeared. No growth meant no new money for more expansion, without expansion, revenues would now rely on the return on principal, just like bonds. The feeding frenzy stopped, as money wanted and needed the quicker returns to keep Wall Street with equal levels of fees (profits). Thus, with lesser fees came lesser profits, and with lesser profits came lesser value to stock price.

Pretty simple. Lesson learned? uh, no.

So, as a replacement, in Jan. 2001, the Fed dropped interest rates. This started, purposely, another bubble.

Wall Street, having learned a little, knew this would end one day. Here’s the point: They willfully created risky, speculative, securitized creative financial vehicles to generate fees, in a ‘get as much as you can before it blows’ mentality.

When the inflow of loans to securitize did not meet the demand THEY created for these financial vehicles, they encouraged lowering, and subsequently elimination, of sound loan guidelines.

This, in turn, encouraged a culture of similar attitude involving everyone in the real estate market. From real estate agents, to originators, to underwriters to title companies.

Not every single person in this arena happily participated. There are many who tried to blow whistles. They usually were fired or told to shut up or be fired, or were denied referrals.

But these people were the exceptions to the rule. Most people just turned a blind eye, believing they had the right to make the money too. It didn’t matter if the system was being put at risk due to loans being given people who might not be able to pay them back. The moral breakdown was blatant, widespread and pervasive. It was a get as much as you can mentality.

The question I can’t shake - A radical change is coming for how America is governed. In 50 years will we be one North American government with the Amero, or is there enough foment to have a “tea party’ and all that follows?

Last Tuesday, October 7th, the second presidential debate that took place in Belmont University in Nashville attracted over 60 million viewers. Instead of coming to a more firm deliberation on how to improve the well-being of the United States and all of the American citizens who inhabit it, more questions have raised about how exactly these presidential candidates intend to better our obliterated economy. Frequent questions asked about the $700 billion Wall Street bailout were left unanswered. People are upset and even fear that it would not work and are in search of reassurance and a solution. It seems like their main focus is basically to criticize each other in hopes of rounding up a larger number of followers than the other. Their proposed intentions are based on completely irrelevant issues. Let’s take Barak Obama’s stance on payday advance lenders for an instance. He categorized them as “predatory lending”- effectively sanctioning the industry. This is not an issue that is downheartedly affecting our economy. As the real economic problems are ignored, they spend more time finding and using the pettiest affairs to add spice to the banking production.

Post Courtesy of Personal Money Store
Professional Blogging Team
Feed Back: 1-866-641-3406
Home: http://personalmoneystore.com/NoFaxPaydayLoans.html
Blog: http://personalmoneystore.com/moneyblog/