Trackback This Post | Subscribe to the comments through RSS Feed
The White House on Monday blasted The New York Times for “irresponsibly distort[ing] President Bush’s strong commitment to strengthening and expanding support for America’s service members and their families.”
In an editorial on a new GI Bill, which passed the Senate ahead of recess, and Bush’s opposition to the legislation as written, the paper said that “having saddled the military with a botched, unwinnable war, having squandered soldiers’ lives and failed them in so many ways, the commander in chief now resists giving the troops a chance at better futures out of uniform.”
The White House reacted quickly and strongly.
“This editorial could not be farther from the truth about the president’s record of leadership on this issue,” White House Press Secretary Dana Perino said in a statement. She added that the newspaper’s editorial board “doesn’t let the facts get in the way of expressing its vitriolic opinions - no matter how misleading they may be.”
Perino noted that the Pentagon has “specific concerns” about the legislation that was passed in the Senate, pointing out that the White House supports a GOP-sponsored version of the measure. In addition, she touted several steps Bush has taken to help service members and their families.
The criticism of The New York Times is the second time this month that the White House has aggressively gone after media outlets. White House counselor Ed Gillespie earlier this month had blasted NBC News for how it edited an interview with Bush and for quietly ending its practice of referring to the internal strife in Iraq as a “civil war” even though the network made a big deal out of its decision to label the conflict as such in 2006.
–by Klaus Marre
Popularity: 1% [?]
The New York Times gave us the accurate picture! Enough said!
That’s exactly what happened. The facts have been the same for 5 years.
Compared to the utterly incompetent, despicable, slimy criminal element currently occupying the White House, The New York Times is a venerable beacon of journalistic virtue, and a noble, uncompromising bastion of moral rectitude.
Impeach Bush now!
Here Here.
Impeach Bush Now!
Compared to the utterly incompetent, despicable, slimy criminal element currently occupying the New York Times, President Bush is a venerable beacon of virtue, and a noble, uncompromising bastion of moral rectitude.
…impeach Bush for what? Doing his job, protecting our nation, saving the economy after 9/11???
Oh my, how the truth hurts! The treasonous gang in the White House must be trying to prepare a compassionate conservative legacy for its hereafter.
How sad for America.
Doing his job, protecting our nation, saving the economy after 9/11??? Is this person kidding? Or just asleep? We’re in deeper debt than we’ve ever been, with incomes lower than they were in 2000 in addition to the dollar’s value plummeting. Add to that a failed incursion into a country that never posed a threat, missing all the clues about the imminent attack on 9/11 (remember “Osama determined to strike “?), firing US attorneys for political reasons, condoning torture, taking the word of “Curveball” on Iraq’s nuclear capability when Germany had already told us he was a nut job, the looting of the reconstruction money for Iraq (and the missing millions - or is it billions???), the tepid response to Katrina, Jack Abramov and friends, paying off fake reporters (and former generals), an increase in the cost of gas to $4 - and growing, Blackwater killings, Halliburton no-bid contracts. . . I could go on all day. www.politicaldoodle.com
Re Lucille’s sensible questions –
Nope. Weed was not kidding nor had he been asleep. Well, maybe in the fashion of Rip Van Winkle.
Weed is one of them Republykins what is deef, dumb, and blind when it comes to to anything bad or wrong on the part of or stated by his right-wing comrades or anything good or correct on the part of or stated by anyone to the left of Goldwater. Or possibly ol’ Benito Mussolini, whose world also got turned upside down but was in no condition to notice, unlike Weed, who is noticing, but denying.
“Harold and Jumar in Guantanamo” got right despite all of the humor. If only there was a time that GWB would state “it;s okay to distrust the government! Hell, I work in it and I don’t trust it! It’s okay to distruxt your government but, love your country!” What a refreshing idea.
By Danny Schechter
As millions of homes are foreclosed upon, as unemployment grows and inflation mounts, it is time to understand the origins of the crisis and the need to fight for economic justice.
Written by veteran media critic and Emmy winner Rory O'Connor, Shock Jocks features unsparing profiles of the ten worst conservative radio talkers in America, including Michael Savage, Bill O' Reilly, Rush Limbaugh, Don Imus and the rest.