<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><!-- generator="wordpress/2.0.5" -->
<rss version="2.0" 
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/">
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Big Media Slams Proposal to Roll Back Cross-Ownership Rule</title>
	<link>http://www.mediachannel.org/wordpress/2008/05/13/big-media-slams-proposal-to-roll-back-cross-ownership-rule/</link>
	<description>As The Media Watches The World, We Watch The Media</description>
	<pubDate>Mon, 08 Sep 2008 01:29:26 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.0.5</generator>

	<item>
		<title>by: Dr. Robert Weed</title>
		<link>http://www.mediachannel.org/wordpress/2008/05/13/big-media-slams-proposal-to-roll-back-cross-ownership-rule/#comment-16274</link>
		<pubDate>Wed, 14 May 2008 00:38:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.mediachannel.org/wordpress/2008/05/13/big-media-slams-proposal-to-roll-back-cross-ownership-rule/#comment-16274</guid>
					<description>With newspapers losing money left and right and TV stations not doing as well as they used to ... and the huge amount of new media competition ...cross ownership may be one way to save these type of media outlets and keep the service they provide.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>With newspapers losing money left and right and TV stations not doing as well as they used to &#8230; and the huge amount of new media competition &#8230;cross ownership may be one way to save these type of media outlets and keep the service they provide.
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
</channel>
</rss>
