Comments on: Time Magazine Advocates invading Burma http://www.mediachannel.org/wordpress/2008/05/12/time-magazine-advocates-invading-burma/ As The Media Watches The World, We Watch The Media Sat, 30 Aug 2008 05:58:36 +0000 http://wordpress.org/?v=2.0.5 by: Ed http://www.mediachannel.org/wordpress/2008/05/12/time-magazine-advocates-invading-burma/#comment-16234 Tue, 13 May 2008 02:00:59 +0000 http://www.mediachannel.org/wordpress/2008/05/12/time-magazine-advocates-invading-burma/#comment-16234 Another idiot recommends attacking a sovereign nation. Apparently he isn't aware the US is urging Burma to become a democratic country. In my opinion it is up to the citizens of the country whether they want American democracy not our administration. China and other countries are already helping in Burma.If the Burmese government doesn't want us why do we think we are so special? Another idiot recommends attacking a sovereign nation. Apparently he isn’t aware the US is urging Burma to become a democratic country. In my opinion it is up to the citizens of the country whether they want American democracy not our administration.
China and other countries are already helping in Burma.If the Burmese government doesn’t want us why do we think we are so special?

]]> by: Cord;ey Coit http://www.mediachannel.org/wordpress/2008/05/12/time-magazine-advocates-invading-burma/#comment-16230 Tue, 13 May 2008 01:35:31 +0000 http://www.mediachannel.org/wordpress/2008/05/12/time-magazine-advocates-invading-burma/#comment-16230 One hates to follow such learned discourse with simple questions like is the Luce Family still running Time? Chaney going to work there after he's abandoned by the electorate? How much are Time Warner paid for the their bright ideas on warfare? Burma is a very heavily armed narco state and might beat us better than the Sunnis did Bush. Floating war ideas around a guy as doped up as W is a bad idea and beating the war drum against China is goofy. Who will loan us a billion a day to fight the war in Iraq. Much less the two billion a day a war in Burma would cost. What about the rulers of Shan Provence? Do they owe Bush from his drug imorting days. The leaders there get quite salty about people who don't pay the pusher man and they hire excellent collection help. What are they thinking at Time anyway they could ask the people in Warner Records about the unintended consequences of drug deals turning into wars. im One hates to follow such learned discourse with simple questions like is the Luce Family still running Time? Chaney going to work there after he’s abandoned by the electorate? How much are Time Warner paid for the their bright ideas on warfare? Burma is a very heavily armed narco state and might beat us better than the Sunnis did Bush. Floating war ideas around a guy as doped up as W is a bad idea and beating the war drum against China is goofy. Who will loan us a billion a day to fight the war in Iraq. Much less the two billion a day a war in Burma would cost. What about the rulers of Shan Provence?
Do they owe Bush from his drug imorting days. The leaders there get quite salty about people who don’t pay the pusher man and they hire excellent collection help.
What are they thinking at Time anyway they could ask the people in Warner Records about the unintended consequences of drug deals turning into wars.

im

]]> by: Dr. Robert Weed http://www.mediachannel.org/wordpress/2008/05/12/time-magazine-advocates-invading-burma/#comment-16222 Tue, 13 May 2008 00:46:45 +0000 http://www.mediachannel.org/wordpress/2008/05/12/time-magazine-advocates-invading-burma/#comment-16222 Ben, I think YOU are ridiculous! First, many could debate you that Afghanistan and Iraq ARE VERY successful not the failed efforts you suggest. But that is not why I write. Suggesting that China should have launched a war on the Bush government for the humanitarian disaster it would not take seriously in New Orleans it just crazy. The two events are not even close to being the same as far as death toll and response. While the Bush administration can have some blame, the state and city refused help for way too long and many people made no attempt to leave when they were told to go. You also suggest China should have also invaded after the U.S failed to avert massive disaster in Iraq. Hmmm, pehaps you should move to China and see how wonderful that system is ... see how "free" your writing would be under their control. Again, Iraq is not a disaster ... not even close. Any objective view shows how well we have done (built school, created save areas, defeated terrorists). You seem to hate the US ... where does this hate come from and how could you suggest China, a communist system and has no human rights, could be better. I'm not sure we should go to war in Burma ... but your writing is a bit wacko! Ben, I think YOU are ridiculous!

First, many could debate you that Afghanistan and Iraq ARE VERY successful not the failed efforts you suggest.

But that is not why I write.

Suggesting that China should have launched a war on the Bush government for the humanitarian disaster it would not take seriously in New Orleans it just crazy. The two events are not even close to being the same as far as death toll and response. While the Bush administration can have some blame, the state and city refused help for way too long and many people made no attempt to leave when they were told to go.

You also suggest China should have also invaded after the U.S failed to avert massive disaster in Iraq. Hmmm, pehaps you should move to China and see how wonderful that system is … see how “free” your writing would be under their control.

Again, Iraq is not a disaster … not even close. Any objective view shows how well we have done (built school, created save areas, defeated terrorists).

You seem to hate the US … where does this hate come from and how could you suggest China, a communist system and has no human rights, could be better.

I’m not sure we should go to war in Burma … but your writing is a bit wacko!

]]>