Comments on: If 935 falsehoods fall from the White House, do the news media hear them?

by: Jeepster

Fri, 29 Feb 2008 19:24:19 +0000

Mr. Weed and URGullible must be part of the remaining 19% (or less) of americans that still think Bush and cronies are doin’ a heck of a job. I think that pretty much sums up their perspective on lies and destruction of the constitution, eh?
I think you guys need to find some other input besides FAUX “news” and Bill O’Really.

by: Cheryl, Parma, OH

Fri, 29 Feb 2008 18:10:42 +0000

To Dr. Weed: you must be smoking it, because you certainly are out of touch with what has gone in in our country the past 7 years. You all have nothing, except to use that “fear card” every single time. Consider that this administration had the intelligence PRIOR to 9/11 and Bush excused it, saying he wasn’t going to go “swatting at flies”. Consider that all the evidence points to an inside job regarding 9/11, and Bush was complicit either directly or indirectly by doing nothing, at the very least. Most “thinking” people in this country simply dismiss what Bush and his followers have to say, as we know for a fact, that everything they’ve done has simply been their thirst for power and a means to “control” the American people.

To URGULLIBLE … There are no words to describe your total inability to grasp the situation in this country, nor can you comprehend what has happened and where it’s taking us. That is putting it most “kindly”. It is people like yourself who can take credit, along with the corrupt individuals you support, for the destruction of this country (and it’s economy and credibility) and others. No “wrong” is right, but it is apparent that you can’t decipher the difference between apples and oranges here. At this critical time in our country, there just simply is no place for “thinking-challenged” people such as yourself.

by: Roger

Fri, 29 Feb 2008 03:17:46 +0000

Gotta love the right wing-nuts and the continued attacks on the Clinton’s with info that has been proven time and time again to be false. Just like the ‘trashing’ of the White House and the ‘theft of the W’s off the keyboards.’ It was all thrown out there by the GOP when the Clinton’s left the White House the first time and it has all been found to be untruths (as the GOP likes to call them, I call them lies).

by: Dr. Robert Weed

Tue, 26 Feb 2008 07:55:37 +0000

This is the biggest bunch of you know what I have read in a while.

President Clinton, Vice President Gore and other top Democrats SAID THE EXACT SAME THING has Presdident Bush and his team said.

After 9/11, Bush felt he could not risk the chance of Saddam sharing WMD with terrorists who would use it against the US and the west.

Yet, we have some on the left who will put our nation’s security at risk just to gain power and bash Bush … makes so sense at all.

If Bush did nothing and Saddam, besides killing hundreds of thousands of his own people, did work with terrorists and a bomb went off in New York, Chicago or LA what would these same people say? Yep, they would blame Bush amd ask what did he know and when did he know it. They would have asked, why did he not pay more attention to Saddam like Clinton and Gore warned.

Wake up!

by: Gene Winter

Tue, 26 Feb 2008 02:31:46 +0000

George Bush is the most spurious, most prolific, most unabashed liar ever to occupy the White House, period. People who defend him are in unenviable company and should think seriously if they really want to go on record aligning themselves with such a dishonest and dangerous man.

by: Cord;ey Coit

Mon, 25 Feb 2008 23:21:18 +0000

Does this mean that the President gets to go to the Hague and sit in the glass cage?
Can you imagine the Great White Father lying to his subjects?

by: Lucille

Mon, 25 Feb 2008 23:13:49 +0000

I’m still waiting for UR Gullible and his right wing-nuts to blame Clinton for the housing crisis, too, since apparently evetything that has been screwed up, lied abou5 and mismanaged since Jan 20, 2001 is his fault.
www.politicaldoodle.com

by: Bill B

Mon, 25 Feb 2008 22:17:36 +0000

The report of the systematic lies is bad enough. That Republicans almost immediately drag out the “well Clinton did some bad stuff too” argument is pathetic. 1. Clinton’s affair w/ML was wrong, no matter what party you back. 2. Taking stuff from the White House that shouldn’t have been taken - also wrong. 3. Neither one of those times ten can even scratch the surface of how often and how deeply the current administration has lied. UR Gullible’s response is laughable - you’re comparing the deaths of thousands of U.S. soldiers, billions upon billions spent, the loss of the goodwill of the United States across the globe and a completely mismanaged war of occupation to those examples of misdeeds? Perhaps a name change is in order Mr. Gullible to “I.M. Blind”.

by: Stig Persson

Mon, 25 Feb 2008 22:09:34 +0000

Might it be that the media is doing a better job than I expected?
“being shown in a report” to have done..this or that … doesn’t necessarily pass ‘the smell test’.
I would expect journalists to validate the report and it appently didn’t pass even today’s lax media standards.
sp

by: Sandra Andrews

Mon, 25 Feb 2008 22:02:47 +0000

UR Gullible, Didn’t need to publish anything about lies, the Republicans spent over $40Million investigating the Clintons and came up with one lie, “Monica”; when what he should have told them “none of your business”. Typical Republican response though, more concerned about the $122,000 than the lives lost in this “war of choice” of your leader Bush. What about Nancy Reagan’s “theft” of dresses lent to her?