<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><!-- generator="wordpress/2.0.5" -->
<rss version="2.0" 
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/">
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Fox News Is In For A Very Rough 2008</title>
	<link>http://www.mediachannel.org/wordpress/2008/01/30/fox-news-is-in-for-a-very-rough-2008/</link>
	<description>As The Media Watches The World, We Watch The Media</description>
	<pubDate>Wed, 08 Oct 2008 10:19:00 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.0.5</generator>

	<item>
		<title>by: Sarah</title>
		<link>http://www.mediachannel.org/wordpress/2008/01/30/fox-news-is-in-for-a-very-rough-2008/#comment-13839</link>
		<pubDate>Thu, 10 Apr 2008 17:42:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.mediachannel.org/wordpress/2008/01/30/fox-news-is-in-for-a-very-rough-2008/#comment-13839</guid>
					<description>I find it amazing that people are defending FOX, but if you look closely these same people are the ones who can't spell or use proper grammer.. hmm.. I'm only 17 years old and even I realize how Republican FOX news is and how bias it is. And you call yourself "and Independent" for watching it. First off its "AN Independent", second, wake up people, turn off FOX news.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I find it amazing that people are defending FOX, but if you look closely these same people are the ones who can&#8217;t spell or use proper grammer.. hmm.. I&#8217;m only 17 years old and even I realize how Republican FOX news is and how bias it is. And you call yourself &#8220;and Independent&#8221; for watching it. First off its &#8220;AN Independent&#8221;, second, wake up people, turn off FOX news.
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: Coop</title>
		<link>http://www.mediachannel.org/wordpress/2008/01/30/fox-news-is-in-for-a-very-rough-2008/#comment-11612</link>
		<pubDate>Fri, 22 Feb 2008 07:59:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.mediachannel.org/wordpress/2008/01/30/fox-news-is-in-for-a-very-rough-2008/#comment-11612</guid>
					<description>This is an easy one; "you can fool some of the people some of the time but you can't fool all of the people all of the time" Confucious.
It looks like all their lies are finally catching up with them.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This is an easy one; &#8220;you can fool some of the people some of the time but you can&#8217;t fool all of the people all of the time&#8221; Confucious.<br />
It looks like all their lies are finally catching up with them.
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: Rocco</title>
		<link>http://www.mediachannel.org/wordpress/2008/01/30/fox-news-is-in-for-a-very-rough-2008/#comment-10658</link>
		<pubDate>Sat, 02 Feb 2008 07:23:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.mediachannel.org/wordpress/2008/01/30/fox-news-is-in-for-a-very-rough-2008/#comment-10658</guid>
					<description>Fox News uses some of the very same techniques that the Moonies use on their members.  These techniques are the result of a long hidden and scientific research effort.  I call it the science of gaining conscripts.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Fox News uses some of the very same techniques that the Moonies use on their members.  These techniques are the result of a long hidden and scientific research effort.  I call it the science of gaining conscripts.
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: Jean Taylor</title>
		<link>http://www.mediachannel.org/wordpress/2008/01/30/fox-news-is-in-for-a-very-rough-2008/#comment-10618</link>
		<pubDate>Fri, 01 Feb 2008 18:32:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.mediachannel.org/wordpress/2008/01/30/fox-news-is-in-for-a-very-rough-2008/#comment-10618</guid>
					<description>I watch Fox news, sometimes.  When I get bored with CNN's real news, I tell my husband it's time to switch to the gossip station.  I actually enjoy the gossip as a relief from the CNN hard news.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I watch Fox news, sometimes.  When I get bored with CNN&#8217;s real news, I tell my husband it&#8217;s time to switch to the gossip station.  I actually enjoy the gossip as a relief from the CNN hard news.
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: Art</title>
		<link>http://www.mediachannel.org/wordpress/2008/01/30/fox-news-is-in-for-a-very-rough-2008/#comment-10589</link>
		<pubDate>Fri, 01 Feb 2008 04:06:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.mediachannel.org/wordpress/2008/01/30/fox-news-is-in-for-a-very-rough-2008/#comment-10589</guid>
					<description>Hey Jack,

You MUST be a Fox viewer cuz you can't even spell...."Sourios"...geez..where were you emjucated!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hey Jack,</p>
<p>You MUST be a Fox viewer cuz you can&#8217;t even spell&#8230;.&#8221;Sourios&#8221;&#8230;geez..where were you emjucated!
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: Jack</title>
		<link>http://www.mediachannel.org/wordpress/2008/01/30/fox-news-is-in-for-a-very-rough-2008/#comment-10547</link>
		<pubDate>Thu, 31 Jan 2008 11:31:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.mediachannel.org/wordpress/2008/01/30/fox-news-is-in-for-a-very-rough-2008/#comment-10547</guid>
					<description>The Dems are afraid to debate on Fox News because they would have to answere real questions about their records and their past positions and the flip-flopping.. Ruppert Merdock and George Sourios don't own Fox. They can't control it..Oooooh my God.. CNN is up for a couple of weeks out of the past 8 yrs.and you make it sound like the second coming..</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The Dems are afraid to debate on Fox News because they would have to answere real questions about their records and their past positions and the flip-flopping.. Ruppert Merdock and George Sourios don&#8217;t own Fox. They can&#8217;t control it..Oooooh my God.. CNN is up for a couple of weeks out of the past 8 yrs.and you make it sound like the second coming..
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: Knox</title>
		<link>http://www.mediachannel.org/wordpress/2008/01/30/fox-news-is-in-for-a-very-rough-2008/#comment-10536</link>
		<pubDate>Thu, 31 Jan 2008 06:13:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.mediachannel.org/wordpress/2008/01/30/fox-news-is-in-for-a-very-rough-2008/#comment-10536</guid>
					<description>What is this Fox News you speak of?  Foxes are sneaky by nature and their words cannot be trusted.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>What is this Fox News you speak of?  Foxes are sneaky by nature and their words cannot be trusted.
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: Lark</title>
		<link>http://www.mediachannel.org/wordpress/2008/01/30/fox-news-is-in-for-a-very-rough-2008/#comment-10535</link>
		<pubDate>Thu, 31 Jan 2008 05:51:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.mediachannel.org/wordpress/2008/01/30/fox-news-is-in-for-a-very-rough-2008/#comment-10535</guid>
					<description>FOX News? Are they still on the air?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>FOX News? Are they still on the air?
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: Walter Hayum</title>
		<link>http://www.mediachannel.org/wordpress/2008/01/30/fox-news-is-in-for-a-very-rough-2008/#comment-10518</link>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Jan 2008 20:36:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.mediachannel.org/wordpress/2008/01/30/fox-news-is-in-for-a-very-rough-2008/#comment-10518</guid>
					<description>The pro Fox comment from one reader makes it crystal clear that a lot of Americans don't seek facts and truths,they simply remain  happily in their ignorance.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The pro Fox comment from one reader makes it crystal clear that a lot of Americans don&#8217;t seek facts and truths,they simply remain  happily in their ignorance.
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: Al Doyle</title>
		<link>http://www.mediachannel.org/wordpress/2008/01/30/fox-news-is-in-for-a-very-rough-2008/#comment-10517</link>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Jan 2008 20:32:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.mediachannel.org/wordpress/2008/01/30/fox-news-is-in-for-a-very-rough-2008/#comment-10517</guid>
					<description>As a Ron Paul supporter, I can say from experience that Faux Noose makes the Soviet-era Pravda look like a beacon of journalistic objectivity and integrity by comparison.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>As a Ron Paul supporter, I can say from experience that Faux Noose makes the Soviet-era Pravda look like a beacon of journalistic objectivity and integrity by comparison.
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
</channel>
</rss>
