<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><!-- generator="wordpress/2.0.5" -->
<rss version="2.0" 
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/">
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Setting the Stage for a People-Powered Web in 2008</title>
	<link>http://www.mediachannel.org/wordpress/2008/01/04/setting-the-stage-for-a-people-powered-web-in-2008/</link>
	<description>As The Media Watches The World, We Watch The Media</description>
	<pubDate>Fri, 21 Nov 2008 23:26:23 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.0.5</generator>

	<item>
		<title>by: Cord;ey Coit</title>
		<link>http://www.mediachannel.org/wordpress/2008/01/04/setting-the-stage-for-a-people-powered-web-in-2008/#comment-9526</link>
		<pubDate>Sat, 05 Jan 2008 02:15:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.mediachannel.org/wordpress/2008/01/04/setting-the-stage-for-a-people-powered-web-in-2008/#comment-9526</guid>
					<description>Then why did Yahoo down grade Media Channel to Spam. I had to dig it and other political-press reports out of bulk  when spam was arriving at the rate of a hundred an hour. 
We have DSL at the highest prices in 
Christendom because we are rural. The switches were bought with the rural phone company and the gate keepers are here.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Then why did Yahoo down grade Media Channel to Spam. I had to dig it and other political-press reports out of bulk  when spam was arriving at the rate of a hundred an hour.<br />
We have DSL at the highest prices in<br />
Christendom because we are rural. The switches were bought with the rural phone company and the gate keepers are here.
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: Dave R.</title>
		<link>http://www.mediachannel.org/wordpress/2008/01/04/setting-the-stage-for-a-people-powered-web-in-2008/#comment-9513</link>
		<pubDate>Fri, 04 Jan 2008 22:07:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.mediachannel.org/wordpress/2008/01/04/setting-the-stage-for-a-people-powered-web-in-2008/#comment-9513</guid>
					<description>The NAB is correct about unlicensed devices causing interference to adjacent channel TV stations.  The FCC failed to mandate high-tech TV tuners that would have rejected this interference.

While coexistence between the techs and the broadcasters WAS possible, there is no way to recall over a million cheap HDTV sets already deployed.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The NAB is correct about unlicensed devices causing interference to adjacent channel TV stations.  The FCC failed to mandate high-tech TV tuners that would have rejected this interference.</p>
<p>While coexistence between the techs and the broadcasters WAS possible, there is no way to recall over a million cheap HDTV sets already deployed.
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
</channel>
</rss>
