Comments on: Would You Bomb Iran, Yes or No?

by: Kamndrini

Mon, 24 Mar 2008 17:35:37 +0000

I’d prefer reading in my native language, because my knowledge of your languange is no so well.

by: Kamndrini

Fri, 08 Feb 2008 18:59:10 +0000

I’d prefer reading in my native language, because my knowledge of your languange is no so well. But it was interesting! Look for some my links:

by: Doodee

Sun, 03 Feb 2008 06:14:03 +0000

Thanks for sharing

by: Frank

Mon, 03 Dec 2007 01:18:49 +0000

As long as Ahmadinejad, the madman of Iran is in power, I think I’d want a little restraint as to what Iran could do with nuclear power. As long as it truly was for peaceful purposes, supplying electrical power to the people of Iran, that wouldn’t be a problem. But, Ahmadinejad doesn’t seem to get it that if he was to order a nuke bomb dropped on Israel, the fallout would also affect the people of his country. As long as he remains in power, it makes sense to monitor what Iran is doing with that power. Same goes for his replacement if that person holds the same belief as Ahmadinejad. Bush, I think, is still itching for some kind of showdown but can’t do much of anything because so far, all of Ahmadinejad’s talk is just that: words. He hasn’t put any of his words into action and I don’t think he will. He’s simply a dog whose bark is worse than his bite. As for Bush, with him having to battle with the senate and congress just to get the funding for the continued battles in Iraq and Afghanistan, he’s doing little more than saber rattling. But, he’s not a dog whose bark is worse than his bite; he’s a snake whose misdirections in the war needs to be reined in and then refocused on the true enemy: Bin Laden and Al Qaeda. The good people of Iraq and Iran were not our enemies but the damage being done in Iraq after removing Saddam from power and Bush’s saber rattling threats to Iran turns them against us. We need to remove our troops from Iraq and let their people decide what they’re going to do. It’s not our battle but Bush has made it ours and it’s not working. And the reason for that is that once Bush achieved his objective, he had no follow-up plans on what to do next. But, he’s been winging it ever since without success.

by: PJD

Sun, 25 Nov 2007 04:38:31 +0000

I would only bomb Iran in response to an act of unprovoked naked aggression on Iran’s part.

Since it it preposterous to even imagine Iran doing such a thing (only the US and it’s puppet Israel do such things). I can’t imagine the occasion arising that would necessitate bombing Iran.

Furthermore, even if Iran develops a nuclear bomb, this is still NOT an occasion for bombing them. They are a sovereign nation and as far as I’m concerned, they can develop any weapon they f–ing feel like. With the nuclear deterrent power of the US and it puppets around them, an unprovoked nuclear attack by Iran is unimaginable. But boy-oh-boy, those WITH a proven record of unprovoked attacks (US and Israel) would sure think twice before attacking Iran!

So, in conclusion, not only would I NOT bomb Iran, but I would see an Iranian N-bomb as a great stabilizing force for the region.

by: Rick

Tue, 20 Nov 2007 13:17:33 +0000

I read all of the hateful, militaristic rhetoric included in these posts and I cry. I do wonder if there is no turning back from a future with the United States as evil empire. Even when dealing with despots the goal is to rise above them not climb down to their level and use their tactics. Or maybe not, anymore, I guess.

by: orion57

Tue, 13 Nov 2007 23:59:36 +0000

Quick question to all the loonies out there who think that bombing Iran makes sense:

What do you think would happen next?

by: Frank

Wed, 07 Nov 2007 03:31:59 +0000

There’s a difference between the man who dropped the bomb on Hiroshima: we were at war with the Japanese in World War II. We are not at war presently with Iran, despite Bush’s desire to do to Iran what he has done to Iraq. Bush is not capable of stabilizing the middle eastern countries; he seems to be only capable of destabilizing and destroying that region and our economy in the process. It’s not for America to say? I wish but Bush is hell-bent and bound on doing what he wants to do and the hell with what the rest of the country thinks, even those within his own party.

I do agree with you that Israel wouldn’t hesitate for one minute to take out any nuclear facilities in Iran if they believed that Iran’s purpose is to construct nuclear bombs. Israel would be the immediate target by Iran, but again, they are sitting idly by and doing nothing, suggesting they’re not putting any faith in Bush’s rhetoric as to what’s going on there. Or perhaps they’re waiting in the hope that idiot Bush will be the one to go in and do the dirty work and that the US will draw the wrath and ire of the other middle eastern countries.

by: Morris

Tue, 06 Nov 2007 16:25:44 +0000

Bomb the Pentagon instead….

by: Peter Knopfler

Mon, 05 Nov 2007 21:29:20 +0000

Harsh realities, recently Tibbet died at 95, the Man who dropped the bomb on Hiroshima, He said a few years ago, ” I never lost any sleep, I beleive I saved more lives than I lost”. History will repeat itself in Iran. It is not for America to ask yes or no, Ask Israel, who is being threatened. Israel will bomb out of survival, “Never Again” Ask Holocaust survivors. It’s not for America to say, it’s out of your hands, USA.