Trackback This Post | Subscribe to the comments through RSS Feed

New York, October 8, 2007: On Sunday, October 6, the Public Editor of the New York Times pointed to all the discrepancies and conflicts in the violence figures coming out of Iraq. He called for more nuanced reporting and increased public skepticism. He noted that the perception of progress there has been bolstered by the release of questionable statistics.
What’s true of reporting from Iraq is also true about the job figures that the government releases monthly gauging the health of the U.S. economy. Can they be trusted? And what about the reporting on them? This is an especially timely issue as Fox News gets ready to launch its own heavily-hyped new Business Channel.
For weeks, we have heard all these warnings about the financial crisis sharpening and a possible recession. Reality intruded after a big subprime relief rally sent stocks soaring. Wall Street was quickly back in swamp, and it looked like the Federal Reserve Bank would have to cut interest rates again to further bail out the markets.
But then, on Friday, the Bush Labor Department announced a new jobs report and much of the coverage turned upbeat.
The report offered preliminary data claiming that the economy added 100,000 jobs in September. Suddenly, lower job figures from July and August were also magically revised upwards.
Wall Street went crazy. The S&P went up and the headlines went positive.
Here are two examples of the spin:
The New York Times: “JOB GROWTH LOOKS ROSIER, EASING RECESSION FEARS.”
The Wall Street Journal: “US ECONOMY DOWN, NOT OUT.”
The new numbers accounted for the turn around? Bear in mind, back in the 90s, in the Clinton years, 200,000 new jobs was expected on a monthly basis to assure economic growth. That was the gold standard. Now that number has been cut in half and is suddenly being treated as Great Leap Forward. How did the job numbers turn around? Or have they?
Reports the Journal: “Much of the revision was caused by recalibrating seasonal fluctuations in government employment, including teaching.”
Mmmmm… recalibrations of seasonal fluctuations! I’d love to let Stephen Colbert loose on that phrase. Look more closely and you will see these recalibrations deal with GOVERNMENT EMPLOYMENT, not jobs in the private sector. There were 71,000 jobs “recalibrated” in local education.
Yet establishment economists are saying these jobs are not what the economy really needs. The Journal quotes Nigel Gault, chief economist at Global Insight, to the effect that “private sector jobs are the underlying driver of the economy.”
Yes they are, but these are not them. The biggest jump here is in government jobs. NBC News reported on yet more job cuts in Flint, Michigan Saturday and that manufacturing jobs are at their lowest point since 1950.
Presumably you would think the disappearance of these jobs would be upsetting to the wise men of Wall Street. In fact, they are but their concerns are being buried in stories that fuel the perception that the corner is being turned.
Example: Way down in the 19th paragraph of the Journal article Donald Kohn, the Vice Chairman of the Federal Reserve Bank, says he expected that the nation’s “economic performance would be better.” He says, “You should view these forecasts even more skeptically than usual.”
But the business press, like the market that loves any excuse for a good rally, is not that skeptical. They tend to like positive numbers and downplay negative ones often without analyzing them.
Back at the NY Times, you had to jump from page one in the Business section with its, “Job Growth Looks Rosier” headline to page 8. There, at the very bottom of the last page, next to the corporate bond data — a place most readers don’t venture —are these quotes:
“I don’t think we’re totally out of the woods yet,” said Jan Hatzius, Chief United States economist for Goldman Sachs. “There are some real problems at the foundations of the economy. If nothing really bad happens, we can muddle through and unwind some of these problems over a lengthy period of time. And if something bad happens, we go into a recession.”
So there it is, that depressing “R word” again, but pushed all the way down in the story. In journalism we used to call this “burying the lead.”
Clearly the recession threat hasn’t gone away. Not at all! As for “bad things” to fear, that surely includes the expected jump in oil prices and more unemployment. The actual rise reported in unemployment was minimized in most of the press accounts. (On Sunday, London’s Observer reported: “Tens of thousands of New York bankers are braced for a crippling round of job cuts as the aftershocks of the credit-market collapse reverberate the length and breadth of Wall Street.”)
Says Ethan Harris, the Chief United States Economist at Lehman Brothers, “We’re likely to go through an extended period of slow economic growth. We’re likely to see a further drop in the job market, a further rise in the unemployment rate, and, ultimately the fed will come back again and cut interest rates.”
So there you have it, expectations of more bad news and hopes for another intervention by the Fed. These experts quoted in the stories actually contradict the upbeat tone of the stories and their headlines. Next month’s Jobs Report will have to factor in the 100,000 plus jobs lost in finance and housing which have already occurred but are not yet reflected in the statistics.
In other words, these reports, like the coverage that say the surge is working in Iraq, are selective and inflated. They are aimed more at influencing perceptions than providing truth.
My questions: How do they get away with this? Why does the market buy it? Why does the press do it? And what are they leaving out?
Businessman and financial analyst Eric Janszen says our economy is increasingly showing the features of a Banana Republic, with low-paid government and service jobs for all. He writes on his website iTulip.com that the private goods producing sector so vital to a sound economy is shrinking:
“Construction firms cut 14,000 jobs in September, Factories slashed 18,000. Retailers got rid of just over 5,000 jobs. Financial services companies eliminated 14,000 slots.
However, gains in education and health services, professional services, leisure and hospitality, and in government work more than offset those losses, leading to a net gain in new jobs in September.”
Jobs in government now parallel jobs in the good producing sector, he reports, as the dollar is being depreciated.
“The magic of a depreciating currency is working,” he writes. “Foreign investors are buying UBRA (United Banana Republic of America) stocks and other assets at fire sale prices. Tourism is up as visitors from Asia, Europe, Canada and all other countries whose currencies have appreciated… visit the US for a cheap UBRA vacation, driving leisure and hospitality jobs within the service sector where most of the job growth occurred.”
And wages? They are not rising as fast as prices. His conclusion:
“Suppression of wage increases has been the centerpiece of monetary and government policy to manage inflation in the Production/Consumption Economy since 1980. Given the difficulty in acquiring legitimate measures of actual inflation rates in the US economy, there is no way of telling whether these wage increases translate into increased purchasing power. Given the rise of oil and other commodity prices, it seems doubtful. In fact, it looks like the UBRA is going full-bore banana republic, including wage and price inflation to maintain employment going into an election year.”
So there you have it: politically influenced numbers, another reason not to trust the mainstream media and search out more thoughtful analysis elsewhere.
As the old saying holds, “Figures lie and liars figure.”
– News Dissector Danny Schechter edits Mediachannel.org. He directed the film IN DEBT WE TRUST (Indebtwetrust.com) Comments to Dissector@mediachannel.org
Popularity: 2% [?]
I’ll keep it simple: this is a very important and insightful piece. The falsity, inadequacy, or irrelevant headlining, content or lack of content of official government economic figures is a matter of a vital distinction–between government servitors doing their constitutuonal jobs and treason being committed.
Economics is the science of capitalism–what happens in what’s supposed to be a category-level defined marketplace of lives, of societal agreement-signing citizens and the responsibilities and limited partnership agreements they make with one another in re jobs and leadership attainments,
goods and services and elected and appointed tribunate positions, including definings, monitorings, legal, judicial, police and monitoring positions and more.
What Mr. Schechter describes here I assert is a non-economy–a totalitarian imitation of a former country. By definition, a totalitarian public-interest tsardom has no monetary system–bills are printed like toilet paper by the tsar’s boys and handed out to cronies.
So too are lies–coined by the in crowd and foisted off on victims as disinformation, false information and anti-conceptual fraud.
The United States has beyond argument been theoretically a public-interest dictatorship since 1902, and one in practice in full since 1994. The loss of manufacturing job, income, rights claimed under regulations by individuals, categorizing definitions that protect individual excellence, a cutback in monitors, increases infavors to undersving wealthy, bureaucratic, corporate, partisan henchmen, bribe artists, financial tsars, media tsars, academic tsars, monopolists and gatekeepers over every phase and area of thought, publication, jobs, hiring and merit–this litany of felony and treason should frighten the trousers off all of us.
Of course the economy is terrible; my father fed at the public trough as a postman in 1941. To live as well as he did on 4,000 then, nowadays two people and two children would need over 100,000. Yet even his position is paid 28,000–and those without a hand in the public till are doing even worse relative to former economic decades.
This is the political reality behind Mr. Schechter’s admirable job of smelling a rat–or an entire administration of them when they lie about, cook or ignore prioritized true statistics…
Thank you Mr. Schechter for telling the truth, the one that extremist Republicans and altruist Democrats, to a lesser degree, are refusing to tell us: that things are terrible, injust, and getting a lot worse slowly or rapidly depending upon your sector. That we have warped a nation whose constitution guaranteed each adult individual life, liberty and the pursuit of prioritized into the categorical opposite of that American protection of individual capital investment of time, money, hope, honesty, hard work, purpose ans eanred property.
In a nation without rights, which is postmodernist in its anti-realism, anti-individualism and lack of an justice system and categorically-defined scientific definitions to protect individuals’ rights, it’s important that each citizen grasps his real position–slave to insider imperial presidential hacks, cronies and other psuedo-theocratic infallibility spouting public bosses.
Our citizens need to know what’s been done to them–so they’ll stop looking for a savior on a white horse to come galoping down Pennsylvania Avenue to rescue them.
After all, who’d want to be a citizen of the first republic in history whose citizens were so unrealistic in their thinking that they failed to recognize that they had been made wage slaves of a benevolent-as-hell empire of evil cronies and oil-worshipping neocon extremists?
If the truth shall make you free, what do you think its opposite does? A word to the wise…
Both Robert and Danny have it right. How can a non existent economy turn around.
There is nothing manufactured in this country, the smallest business are off shore. The art book I buy is made in China. The smallest art tool is made in China and useless, even dangerous.
“My”style of drawing is made in China.
The owners of these small and not so small businesses are simply front office people, actors hired to look good for the Chinese military machine.
The news people reporting are simply actors for far away bankers. welcome to “the desert of the real.” With thanks to John Zarzen…
I have been skeptical of job growth figures for years. “New jobs” is a meaningless figure. We need a “living wage equivalent” figure to make sense of this data. A lost union job paying $45,000 per year with benefits worth 20% of base salary does not compare with a new full time food service job at minimum wage and no benefits. ‘
Why can’t we have a jobs gained/jobs lost figure based on a standardized “living wage” job adequate to modestly support a family of 4 people–maybe $50,000 per year with benefits valued at 20% of base salary. Under this fomula, three or four “new” jobs at minimum wage and no benefits would equal one lost union job with benefits. Such a calculation would generate a “net gain/loss” of “living wage” jobs. Such a calculation would make sense to most citizens, allow them to decide easily if the economy is getting better or worse, and end the charade of labor department spin that reports only the meaningless figure of “new jobs created”.
I believe what everyone is saying is that “There are three kinds of lies: Lies, Damn Lies, and Statistics!” The title of a great “beginners” book on statistics and the authors name I am unable to remember at this time. Hell, I had the course back in the ’70’s?
At any rate, we can now feel reasonably confident that what we felt might be taking place with this G.W. administration is actually taking place! G.W. has NEVER told a truth, that I am aware of? And he has manipulated every department under him, including the fourth estate-the MSM, into following his lead.
We all–EVERYONE OF US–missed the first opportunity to stop this, the theft of the 2000 election. Likewise, we stood by and let the 2004 election be stolen! What will we do in 2008, if there really is an election in 2008? Can we afford to wait and find out?
TRUST, did you really ask if we TRUST? After the first lie I always give a second chance, but after years of lies . . .
As an American expatriate who has left the country, thank goodness in 1989 for the second and last time, I would like to kick some butt REAL hard so that the citizens of the USA start to take action so as to unshackle themselves from the slave bound lies and policies that are depleting the country’s most valuable resource: those very people. How can I as one lone ranger do that? Everyone reading this site is intelligent, aware and in complete agreeement with you Danny. I’ve donated dollars to you to keep up the work. We need a tremendous forcefield to sweep the nation into wakefulness. I agree with the comment above about the country becoming a Banana Republic and that the election being stolen in 2000 was the lowest point in the history of this undemocratic regime. Still, when people are forcefed consumer products and fast food, they become inured. It will take a revolution.
I think the statistics book you’re refering to is “How to Lie with Statistics” by Darrell Huff (pictures by Irving Geis) originally published in the early 1950’s and in print continuously since then.
It is a true classic. Go buy a copy and read it if you haven’t already. The points made in it haven’t lost any of their meaning in the past 50 years, though some of the examples are dated.
By Danny Schechter
As millions of homes are foreclosed upon, as unemployment grows and inflation mounts, it is time to understand the origins of the crisis and the need to fight for economic justice.
Written by veteran media critic and Emmy winner Rory O'Connor, Shock Jocks features unsparing profiles of the ten worst conservative radio talkers in America, including Michael Savage, Bill O' Reilly, Rush Limbaugh, Don Imus and the rest.