<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><!-- generator="wordpress/2.0.5" -->
<rss version="2.0" 
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/">
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Democrats Go After Limbaugh</title>
	<link>http://www.mediachannel.org/wordpress/2007/10/02/democrats-go-after-limbaugh/</link>
	<description>As The Media Watches The World, We Watch The Media</description>
	<pubDate>Fri, 21 Nov 2008 14:50:14 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.0.5</generator>

	<item>
		<title>by: Kamndrini</title>
		<link>http://www.mediachannel.org/wordpress/2007/10/02/democrats-go-after-limbaugh/#comment-12961</link>
		<pubDate>Mon, 24 Mar 2008 05:49:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.mediachannel.org/wordpress/2007/10/02/democrats-go-after-limbaugh/#comment-12961</guid>
					<description>I’d prefer reading in my native language, because my knowledge of your languange is no so well.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I’d prefer reading in my native language, because my knowledge of your languange is no so well.
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: Kamndrini</title>
		<link>http://www.mediachannel.org/wordpress/2007/10/02/democrats-go-after-limbaugh/#comment-11005</link>
		<pubDate>Fri, 08 Feb 2008 19:51:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.mediachannel.org/wordpress/2007/10/02/democrats-go-after-limbaugh/#comment-11005</guid>
					<description>I’d prefer reading in my native language, because my knowledge of your languange is no so well. But it was interesting! Look for some my links:</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I’d prefer reading in my native language, because my knowledge of your languange is no so well. But it was interesting! Look for some my links:
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: Doodee</title>
		<link>http://www.mediachannel.org/wordpress/2007/10/02/democrats-go-after-limbaugh/#comment-10606</link>
		<pubDate>Fri, 01 Feb 2008 11:34:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.mediachannel.org/wordpress/2007/10/02/democrats-go-after-limbaugh/#comment-10606</guid>
					<description>Thanks for sharing</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks for sharing
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: Ed</title>
		<link>http://www.mediachannel.org/wordpress/2007/10/02/democrats-go-after-limbaugh/#comment-6151</link>
		<pubDate>Fri, 05 Oct 2007 01:46:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.mediachannel.org/wordpress/2007/10/02/democrats-go-after-limbaugh/#comment-6151</guid>
					<description>Ole drug sucking Limbaugh should be restricted from airing on Armed Forces Radio Network. He is insulting our troops! Hey ole Limballs got deferred and wonder why, yet he is asking our military to stay until the war in Iraq is won!  Why in the hell doesn't he volunteer for the service and promise to lead troops into battle. He's a sick man but well supported by the Right Wing in Washington</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Ole drug sucking Limbaugh should be restricted from airing on Armed Forces Radio Network. He is insulting our troops! Hey ole Limballs got deferred and wonder why, yet he is asking our military to stay until the war in Iraq is won!  Why in the hell doesn&#8217;t he volunteer for the service and promise to lead troops into battle. He&#8217;s a sick man but well supported by the Right Wing in Washington
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: Barbara Schuler</title>
		<link>http://www.mediachannel.org/wordpress/2007/10/02/democrats-go-after-limbaugh/#comment-6125</link>
		<pubDate>Thu, 04 Oct 2007 13:50:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.mediachannel.org/wordpress/2007/10/02/democrats-go-after-limbaugh/#comment-6125</guid>
					<description>Now I know why Rush is a doper,he can't, won't admit he is ever wrong, and he will drag every right-wing nut that believes him down, rather than say he is wrong. I hope he crashes soon.He is a disgrace to this country.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Now I know why Rush is a doper,he can&#8217;t, won&#8217;t admit he is ever wrong, and he will drag every right-wing nut that believes him down, rather than say he is wrong. I hope he crashes soon.He is a disgrace to this country.
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: Frank</title>
		<link>http://www.mediachannel.org/wordpress/2007/10/02/democrats-go-after-limbaugh/#comment-6107</link>
		<pubDate>Thu, 04 Oct 2007 05:17:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.mediachannel.org/wordpress/2007/10/02/democrats-go-after-limbaugh/#comment-6107</guid>
					<description>Rush Limbaugh is incompatible with the truth. It's amazing to me that neocon Republicans place their trust and faith in *Bush cheerleaders* like Limbaugh and Hannity and others like them, who are all gung ho in favor of the war in Iraq because they know they won't be called upon to make the ultimate sacrifice and help root out the terrorists. They might sing a different tune if they were the ones risking their lives over in Iraq. But, the Team Bush cheerleaders can cheer on the war from the safety of their seats in the radio station control booths.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Rush Limbaugh is incompatible with the truth. It&#8217;s amazing to me that neocon Republicans place their trust and faith in *Bush cheerleaders* like Limbaugh and Hannity and others like them, who are all gung ho in favor of the war in Iraq because they know they won&#8217;t be called upon to make the ultimate sacrifice and help root out the terrorists. They might sing a different tune if they were the ones risking their lives over in Iraq. But, the Team Bush cheerleaders can cheer on the war from the safety of their seats in the radio station control booths.
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: Phil Linehan</title>
		<link>http://www.mediachannel.org/wordpress/2007/10/02/democrats-go-after-limbaugh/#comment-6097</link>
		<pubDate>Thu, 04 Oct 2007 00:32:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.mediachannel.org/wordpress/2007/10/02/democrats-go-after-limbaugh/#comment-6097</guid>
					<description>Rush is obviously eating too much junk food.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Rush is obviously eating too much junk food.
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: Mark Tele</title>
		<link>http://www.mediachannel.org/wordpress/2007/10/02/democrats-go-after-limbaugh/#comment-6071</link>
		<pubDate>Wed, 03 Oct 2007 16:07:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.mediachannel.org/wordpress/2007/10/02/democrats-go-after-limbaugh/#comment-6071</guid>
					<description>Anyone who listens to / blindly agrees with this OxyMoron ChickenHawk at this stage of the game must have the blood of our soldiers leaking out of their ears.  I'm afraid you have had severe head trauma and should immediately seek medical attention before it's too late</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Anyone who listens to / blindly agrees with this OxyMoron ChickenHawk at this stage of the game must have the blood of our soldiers leaking out of their ears.  I&#8217;m afraid you have had severe head trauma and should immediately seek medical attention before it&#8217;s too late
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: draconianguy</title>
		<link>http://www.mediachannel.org/wordpress/2007/10/02/democrats-go-after-limbaugh/#comment-6066</link>
		<pubDate>Wed, 03 Oct 2007 14:48:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.mediachannel.org/wordpress/2007/10/02/democrats-go-after-limbaugh/#comment-6066</guid>
					<description>Josh K: "THAT IS WHOM RUSH WAS TALKING ABOUT." "Again, that’s who Rush was talking about."

No, it isn't, Josh K: it's just who Limbaugh now *claims* he was talking about. Since Limbaugh and the truth have at best only a nodding acquaintance, you should always check any statement he makes.

Here's the transcript from Limbaugh's September 26 broadcast:

=====

LIMBAUGH: Mike in Chicago, welcome to the EIB Network. Hello.

CALLER 1: Hi Rush, how you doing today?

LIMBAUGH: I'm fine sir, thank you.

CALLER 1: Good. Why is it that you always just accuse the Democrats of being against the war and suggest that there are absolutely no Republicans that could possibly be against the war? 

LIMBAUGH: Well, who are these Republicans? I can think of Chuck Hagel, and I can think of Gordon Smith, two Republican senators, but they don't want to lose the war like the Democrats do. I can't think of -- who are the Republicans in the anti-war movement?

CALLER 1: I'm just -- I'm not talking about the senators. I'm talking about the general public -- like you accuse the public of all the Democrats of being, you know, wanting to lose, but -- 

LIMBAUGH: Oh, come on! Here we go again. I uttered a truth, and you can't handle it, so you gotta call here and change the subject. How come I'm not also hitting Republicans? I don't know a single Republican or conservative, Mike, who wants to pull out of Iraq in defeat. The Democrats have made the last four years about that specifically. 

CALLER 1: Well, I am a Republican, and I've listened to you for a long time, and you're right on a lot of things, but I do believe that we should pull out of Iraq. I don't think it's winnable. And I'm not a Democrat, but I just -- sometimes you've got to cut the losses. 

LIMBAUGH: Well, you -- you --

CALLER 1: I mean, sometimes you really gotta know when you're wrong. 

LIMBAUGH: Well, yeah, you do. I'm not wrong on this. The worst thing that can happen is losing this, flying out of there, waving the white flag. Do you have -- 

CALLER 1: Oh, I'm not saying that. I'm not saying anything like that, but, you know --

LIMBAUGH: Well, of course you are.

CALLER 1: No, I'm not.

LIMBAUGH: Bill, the truth is -- the truth is the truth, Mike.

CALLER 1: We did what we were supposed to do, OK. We got rid of Saddam Hussein. We got rid of a lot of the terrorists. Let them run their country --

LIMBAUGH: Oh, good lord! Good lord. 

[...]

CALLER 1: How long is it gonna -- how long do you think we're going to have to be there for them to take care of that?

LIMBAUGH: Mike --

CALLER 1: How long -- you know -- what is it?

LIMBAUGH: Mike --

CALLER 1: What is it? 

LIMBAUGH: Mike, you can't possibly be a Republican.

CALLER 1: I am.

LIMBAUGH: You are -- you are --

CALLER 1: I am definitely a Republican.

LIMBAUGH: You can't be a Republican. You are --

CALLER 1: Oh, I am definitely a Republican.

LIMBAUGH: You are tarnishing the reputation, 'cause you sound just like a Democrat.

CALLER 1: No, but --

LIMBAUGH: The answer to your question --

CALLER 1: -- seriously, how long do we have to stay there --

LIMBAUGH: As long as it takes!

CALLER 1: -- to win it? How long?

LIMBAUGH: As long as it takes! It is very serious.

CALLER 1: And that is what?

LIMBAUGH: This is the United States of America at war with Islamofascists. We stay as long -- just like your job. You do everything you have to do, whatever it takes to get it done, if you take it seriously. 

CALLER 1: So then you say we need to stay there forever --

LIMBAUGH: I -- it won't --

CALLER 1: -- because that's what it'll take.

LIMBAUGH: No, Bill, or Mike -- I'm sorry. I'm confusing you with the guy from Texas.

CALLER 1: See, I -- I've used to be military, OK? And I am a Republican. 

LIMBAUGH: Yeah. Yeah.

CALLER 1: And I do live [inaudible] but --

LIMBAUGH: Right. Right. Right, I know. 

CALLER 1: -- you know, really -- I want you to be saying how long it's gonna take.

LIMBAUGH: And I, by the way, used to walk on the moon!

CALLER 1: How long do we have to stay there?

LIMBAUGH: You're not listening to what I say. You can't possibly be a Republican. I'm answering every question. That's not what you want to hear, so it's not even penetrating your little wall of armor you've got built up.

[...]

LIMBAUGH: Another Mike, this one in Olympia, Washington. Welcome to the EIB Network. Hello. 

CALLER 2: Hi Rush, thanks for taking my call.

LIMBAUGH: You bet.

CALLER 2: I have a retort to Mike in Chicago, because I am a serving American military, in the Army. I've been serving for 14 years, very proudly.

LIMBAUGH: Thank you, sir.

CALLER 2: And, you know, I'm one of the few that joined the Army to serve my country, I'm proud to say, not for the money or anything like that. What I would like to retort to is that, if we pull -- what these people don't understand is if we pull out of Iraq right now, which is about impossible because of all the stuff that's over there, it'd take us at least a year to pull everything back out of Iraq, then Iraq itself would collapse, and we'd have to go right back over there within a year or so. And --

LIMBAUGH: There's a lot more than that that they don't understand. They can't even -- if -- the next guy that calls here, I'm gonna ask him: Why should we pull -- what is the imperative for pulling out? What's in it for the United States to pull out? They can't -- I don't think they have an answer for that other than, "Well, we just gotta bring the troops home."

CALLER 2: Yeah, and, you know what --

LIMBAUGH: "Save the -- keep the troops safe" or whatever. I -- it's not possible, intellectually, to follow these people.

CALLER 2: No, it's not, and what's really funny is, they never talk to real soldiers. They like to pull these soldiers that come up out of the blue and talk to the media. 

LIMBAUGH: The phony soldiers.

CALLER 2: The phony soldiers. If you talk to a real soldier, they are proud to serve. They want to be over in Iraq. They understand their sacrifice, and they're willing to sacrifice for their country.

LIMBAUGH: They joined to be in Iraq. They joined -- 

CALLER 2: A lot of them -- the new kids, yeah.

LIMBAUGH: Well, you know where you're going these days, the last four years, if you signed up. The odds are you're going there or Afghanistan or somewhere.

CALLER 2: Exactly, sir.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Josh K: &#8220;THAT IS WHOM RUSH WAS TALKING ABOUT.&#8221; &#8220;Again, that’s who Rush was talking about.&#8221;</p>
<p>No, it isn&#8217;t, Josh K: it&#8217;s just who Limbaugh now *claims* he was talking about. Since Limbaugh and the truth have at best only a nodding acquaintance, you should always check any statement he makes.</p>
<p>Here&#8217;s the transcript from Limbaugh&#8217;s September 26 broadcast:</p>
<p>=====</p>
<p>LIMBAUGH: Mike in Chicago, welcome to the EIB Network. Hello.</p>
<p>CALLER 1: Hi Rush, how you doing today?</p>
<p>LIMBAUGH: I&#8217;m fine sir, thank you.</p>
<p>CALLER 1: Good. Why is it that you always just accuse the Democrats of being against the war and suggest that there are absolutely no Republicans that could possibly be against the war? </p>
<p>LIMBAUGH: Well, who are these Republicans? I can think of Chuck Hagel, and I can think of Gordon Smith, two Republican senators, but they don&#8217;t want to lose the war like the Democrats do. I can&#8217;t think of &#8212; who are the Republicans in the anti-war movement?</p>
<p>CALLER 1: I&#8217;m just &#8212; I&#8217;m not talking about the senators. I&#8217;m talking about the general public &#8212; like you accuse the public of all the Democrats of being, you know, wanting to lose, but &#8212; </p>
<p>LIMBAUGH: Oh, come on! Here we go again. I uttered a truth, and you can&#8217;t handle it, so you gotta call here and change the subject. How come I&#8217;m not also hitting Republicans? I don&#8217;t know a single Republican or conservative, Mike, who wants to pull out of Iraq in defeat. The Democrats have made the last four years about that specifically. </p>
<p>CALLER 1: Well, I am a Republican, and I&#8217;ve listened to you for a long time, and you&#8217;re right on a lot of things, but I do believe that we should pull out of Iraq. I don&#8217;t think it&#8217;s winnable. And I&#8217;m not a Democrat, but I just &#8212; sometimes you&#8217;ve got to cut the losses. </p>
<p>LIMBAUGH: Well, you &#8212; you &#8211;</p>
<p>CALLER 1: I mean, sometimes you really gotta know when you&#8217;re wrong. </p>
<p>LIMBAUGH: Well, yeah, you do. I&#8217;m not wrong on this. The worst thing that can happen is losing this, flying out of there, waving the white flag. Do you have &#8212; </p>
<p>CALLER 1: Oh, I&#8217;m not saying that. I&#8217;m not saying anything like that, but, you know &#8211;</p>
<p>LIMBAUGH: Well, of course you are.</p>
<p>CALLER 1: No, I&#8217;m not.</p>
<p>LIMBAUGH: Bill, the truth is &#8212; the truth is the truth, Mike.</p>
<p>CALLER 1: We did what we were supposed to do, OK. We got rid of Saddam Hussein. We got rid of a lot of the terrorists. Let them run their country &#8211;</p>
<p>LIMBAUGH: Oh, good lord! Good lord. </p>
<p>[&#8230;]</p>
<p>CALLER 1: How long is it gonna &#8212; how long do you think we&#8217;re going to have to be there for them to take care of that?</p>
<p>LIMBAUGH: Mike &#8211;</p>
<p>CALLER 1: How long &#8212; you know &#8212; what is it?</p>
<p>LIMBAUGH: Mike &#8211;</p>
<p>CALLER 1: What is it? </p>
<p>LIMBAUGH: Mike, you can&#8217;t possibly be a Republican.</p>
<p>CALLER 1: I am.</p>
<p>LIMBAUGH: You are &#8212; you are &#8211;</p>
<p>CALLER 1: I am definitely a Republican.</p>
<p>LIMBAUGH: You can&#8217;t be a Republican. You are &#8211;</p>
<p>CALLER 1: Oh, I am definitely a Republican.</p>
<p>LIMBAUGH: You are tarnishing the reputation, &#8217;cause you sound just like a Democrat.</p>
<p>CALLER 1: No, but &#8211;</p>
<p>LIMBAUGH: The answer to your question &#8211;</p>
<p>CALLER 1: &#8212; seriously, how long do we have to stay there &#8211;</p>
<p>LIMBAUGH: As long as it takes!</p>
<p>CALLER 1: &#8212; to win it? How long?</p>
<p>LIMBAUGH: As long as it takes! It is very serious.</p>
<p>CALLER 1: And that is what?</p>
<p>LIMBAUGH: This is the United States of America at war with Islamofascists. We stay as long &#8212; just like your job. You do everything you have to do, whatever it takes to get it done, if you take it seriously. </p>
<p>CALLER 1: So then you say we need to stay there forever &#8211;</p>
<p>LIMBAUGH: I &#8212; it won&#8217;t &#8211;</p>
<p>CALLER 1: &#8212; because that&#8217;s what it&#8217;ll take.</p>
<p>LIMBAUGH: No, Bill, or Mike &#8212; I&#8217;m sorry. I&#8217;m confusing you with the guy from Texas.</p>
<p>CALLER 1: See, I &#8212; I&#8217;ve used to be military, OK? And I am a Republican. </p>
<p>LIMBAUGH: Yeah. Yeah.</p>
<p>CALLER 1: And I do live [inaudible] but &#8211;</p>
<p>LIMBAUGH: Right. Right. Right, I know. </p>
<p>CALLER 1: &#8212; you know, really &#8212; I want you to be saying how long it&#8217;s gonna take.</p>
<p>LIMBAUGH: And I, by the way, used to walk on the moon!</p>
<p>CALLER 1: How long do we have to stay there?</p>
<p>LIMBAUGH: You&#8217;re not listening to what I say. You can&#8217;t possibly be a Republican. I&#8217;m answering every question. That&#8217;s not what you want to hear, so it&#8217;s not even penetrating your little wall of armor you&#8217;ve got built up.</p>
<p>[&#8230;]</p>
<p>LIMBAUGH: Another Mike, this one in Olympia, Washington. Welcome to the EIB Network. Hello. </p>
<p>CALLER 2: Hi Rush, thanks for taking my call.</p>
<p>LIMBAUGH: You bet.</p>
<p>CALLER 2: I have a retort to Mike in Chicago, because I am a serving American military, in the Army. I&#8217;ve been serving for 14 years, very proudly.</p>
<p>LIMBAUGH: Thank you, sir.</p>
<p>CALLER 2: And, you know, I&#8217;m one of the few that joined the Army to serve my country, I&#8217;m proud to say, not for the money or anything like that. What I would like to retort to is that, if we pull &#8212; what these people don&#8217;t understand is if we pull out of Iraq right now, which is about impossible because of all the stuff that&#8217;s over there, it&#8217;d take us at least a year to pull everything back out of Iraq, then Iraq itself would collapse, and we&#8217;d have to go right back over there within a year or so. And &#8211;</p>
<p>LIMBAUGH: There&#8217;s a lot more than that that they don&#8217;t understand. They can&#8217;t even &#8212; if &#8212; the next guy that calls here, I&#8217;m gonna ask him: Why should we pull &#8212; what is the imperative for pulling out? What&#8217;s in it for the United States to pull out? They can&#8217;t &#8212; I don&#8217;t think they have an answer for that other than, &#8220;Well, we just gotta bring the troops home.&#8221;</p>
<p>CALLER 2: Yeah, and, you know what &#8211;</p>
<p>LIMBAUGH: &#8220;Save the &#8212; keep the troops safe&#8221; or whatever. I &#8212; it&#8217;s not possible, intellectually, to follow these people.</p>
<p>CALLER 2: No, it&#8217;s not, and what&#8217;s really funny is, they never talk to real soldiers. They like to pull these soldiers that come up out of the blue and talk to the media. </p>
<p>LIMBAUGH: The phony soldiers.</p>
<p>CALLER 2: The phony soldiers. If you talk to a real soldier, they are proud to serve. They want to be over in Iraq. They understand their sacrifice, and they&#8217;re willing to sacrifice for their country.</p>
<p>LIMBAUGH: They joined to be in Iraq. They joined &#8212; </p>
<p>CALLER 2: A lot of them &#8212; the new kids, yeah.</p>
<p>LIMBAUGH: Well, you know where you&#8217;re going these days, the last four years, if you signed up. The odds are you&#8217;re going there or Afghanistan or somewhere.</p>
<p>CALLER 2: Exactly, sir.
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: Dr. Robert Weed</title>
		<link>http://www.mediachannel.org/wordpress/2007/10/02/democrats-go-after-limbaugh/#comment-6055</link>
		<pubDate>Wed, 03 Oct 2007 05:13:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.mediachannel.org/wordpress/2007/10/02/democrats-go-after-limbaugh/#comment-6055</guid>
					<description>This would be funny ... but since this is an attempt to use untruths to gain political advantage, this become not funny at all.

Rush was not talking about one man ... all anyone had to do is listen or read the FULL transcript</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This would be funny &#8230; but since this is an attempt to use untruths to gain political advantage, this become not funny at all.</p>
<p>Rush was not talking about one man &#8230; all anyone had to do is listen or read the FULL transcript
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
</channel>
</rss>
