Trackback This Post | Subscribe to the comments through RSS Feed
Source: Daniel Terdiman, CNET
AUSTIN, TEXAS–To longtime CBS broadcaster Dan Rather, American journalism in recent years “has in some ways lost its guts.”
During his hour-long keynote address at South by Southwest Interactive, Rather opined at length on the state of his profession, in which too many journalists have become lapdogs to power, rather than watchdogs.
“I do not exclude myself from this criticism… By and large, so many journalists–there are notable exceptions–have adopted the go-along-to-get-along (attitude),” he said.
So, because of this “access game,” journalism has degenerated into a “very perilous state,” he said in response to a question from his on-stage interviewer, FireDogLake.com writer Jane Hamsher….
In his speech, he touched on the state of the Internet as a way to get information and news to people.
“The Internet is a tremendous tool for not just news, (because) its potential is unlimited for that,” Rather said, but for “illumination and opening things up.”
But he spent most of his time on stage talking about why he thinks many people have lost faith in journalists.
One reason, Rather said, is that questioning power, especially at a time of war, can be perceived as unpatriotic or unsupportive of America’s fighting troops.
“In many ways, what we in journalism need is a spine transplant.” –Dan Rather
That’s “a very serious charge in this country,” Rather said.
“We’ve brought it on ourselves,” he added, “partly because we’ve lost the sense that (the) patriotic journalist will be on his or her feet asking the tough questions. My role as a member of the press is to be sometimes a check and balance on power.”
Indeed, Rather’s ascent to the pinnacles of power in journalism came as a result of his reputation for asking very tough questions and–as Hampshire pointed out–not being afraid to ask follow-up questions, of powerful people like President Richard Nixon, the first President George Bush, current President Bush, Saddam Hussein, and many others.
“In many ways,” said Rather to loud applause, “what we in journalism need is a spine transplant.”
Rather reiterated his feeling that many journalists today–and he repeated that he has fallen for this trap–are willing to get too cozy with people in positions of power, be it in government or corporate life.
“The nexus between powerful journalists and people in government and corporate power,” he said, “has become far too close.”
You can get so close to a source that you become part of the problem, he added. “Some people say that these powerful people use journalists, and they do. And they will use them to the fullest extent possible, right up until the point where the journalist says, ‘Whoa, that’s too far.’”
Rather also said that the consolidation of power in a small number of media companies has hurt the search for the truth in newsrooms across the country. As media conglomerates get bigger, the gap between newsrooms and boardrooms grows, and the goal becomes satisfying shareholders, not citizens, he said.
Therefore, Rather supports increased competition between media companies and between journalists. “So next time someone says, ‘I believe in the capitalist system,’” he said, “tell them Dan Rather says ‘Amen.’”
Rather reiterated the journalist’s role as a watchdog.
“Not as an attack dog… But what does the lapdog do? He just crawls into someone’s lap,” he said. “A good watchdog barks at everything that’s suspicious. I submit to you, the American press’ role is to be a watchdog.”
Hampshire then asked Rather about the state of the Internet and how useful it can be in helping to inform people.
Rather responded that he sees a lot of potential in the Internet, and in the blogosphere in particular, but that he worries about anonymity on a lot of Web sites and blogs.
He said it’s very easy to attack someone when you don’t have to put your name to your complaints. He’s not sure how to strike the right balance between professional and citizen journalism, but he believes the market will eventually provide that solution.
In the end, Rather said, the American people must understand that the news does matter, and that what they see happening on TV or read about on the Internet, is real. War, he said, is real.
“What happens on the streets of Baghdad or Kabul does matter on Main Street.”
Source Link: CNET
Popularity: 3% [?]
Mr. Rather,
I think that people are misunderstood by the press. I can’t speak for right-wingers who only want to hear what they already believe, but for the rest of us, I believe that our criticism is the very spinelessness that you see, and also the “herd mentality” that you and only a handful of others avoid. It is my great respect for what I believed journalism was about that makes me critical of so many of today’s practicianers. Keep up the good work!
Thank You, Mr. Rather! You stated what
had to be said! Been waiting a long time
for someone of stature to say what has
been obvious to me for the last few years!
Since you were one of a few not afraid
to speak truth to power and had the ability to extract answers to tough questions, your words will have more impact! I’m waiting for a “gut transplant” for the current crop of “journalists”.
Thank you, Mr. Rather!
I too have been depressed and disappointed by the spineless state of our “access” journalism. I do believe were it not for very powerful journalists with great access in the White House (i.e, Bob Woodward and Judith Miller) we very well might not have gone so easily into Iraq!
I know I had a hundred questions during the run up to the war, and I was completely amazed at how few almost all members of the fourth estate seemed to have. I concluded that most were “bought off”–by the perks and the access they thought they wanted and needed. This has saddened me so, and I don’t really see it changing in the Mainstream Presx! Certainly in the alternative press there is a groundswell! But old habits die hard, and it may take another generation before our news organizations become the true fourth estate they were meant to be! I am grateful to you for speaking out–and for not becoming bitter!
Peace and Health-
Kate Madison
Depoe Bay, Oregon
Thebigkate@yahoo.com
Dan Rather’s comments confuse “journalism” with “journalists” and “powerful journalists” with “journalists”. We have to keep in mind that what we see in our daily newspaper is not what Rather calls “reality” but the end result of an editorial process. In general, journalists write FOR newspapers and not for the public. Their job is to improve the lot of their employers. What business are their employers in? What do they produce that makes a profit for them? The sorry fact is that the product of the commercial media is not what most people believe it to be. Take commercial media as the extreme example. The only product that commercial television can sell to THEIR customers (other businesses) is audiences — that is what ratings is about. In other words, journalists work for people who make their living from selling the audiences that whatch their stations. In this sense, the journalist is already a lapdog — sitting comfortably in the lap of their corporate employer whose only means of producing a profit is by building and then selling the largest possible audience of viewers to the highest bidder. But then I am sure Rather knows this already.
The late, great, editor of the old Boston Record American once described “A Journalist as a Newspaperman out of a job.” You want to be a reporter, go report. You want to be a journalist, go write a book or work for a weekly “news” magazine.
Mr. Rather,
Your voice is bigger than the average bear. Please help support the man that can change our great nation to what you know it could be….
Please promote Ron Paul for president in 2008…
Thank you
I’m responding as a teacher of inner city high school kids. One of my classes is Broadcast Journalism.
When television journalists lose their spine, they lose more of their younger audience to the web.
While Dan Rather is correct that the internet is a great tool, the online world is full of conspiracy-theorists and barely-guised sites with agendas claiming to deliver news.
I am dismayed at how many of my students buy into crazy theories about 9-11 being an inside job, for example. I think they’re attracted to those sites because mainstream outlets do not present enough information, nor do they ask the right questions.
Journalism will not only turn off the public as it goes soft (I suppose it already has), but it will turn the public towards anyone and anything with a little more bite.
Let’s face it. To many teens, news is “boring.” News that doesn’t deliver the goods, is beyond boring. Kids are turning away from professional news because of the fluff while unsubstantiated claims and online rumors takeover.
Good work!
Mr Rather … you no longer collect a paycheck … so ‘now’ you speak out?(that must make it easier huh?) The rest of the MSM? for instance, Fox on the far Right and Comedy Central on the left(sad I Know) pays talking heads to deliver “news” big $$$$. Once again money does the talking in this country. And buy the way…my 9 year old boy can look at the ‘offical’ 9/11 story and see it’s a big hunk of swiss cheese. Wake up! Both wars are lies…and so is that fateful day in September
Vice Presidential candidate and Alaska Governor Sarah Palin has been getting more negative attention than positive attention from the media. For example, last Saturday Palin made her late-night entertainment debut on Saturday Night Live. Instead of commending Palin for playing along or mentioning that her appearance gave SNL its highest ratings in 14 years, the press criticized her for her appearance. Palin has been under constant attack; the media has bashed Palin for her performance as Governor of Alaska, the pregnancy of her unmarried 17-year-old daughter, and even her character. The media has stooped to new lows by implying that the United States would self-destruct should Palin have to replace McCain as president. As is typical with unbalanced news-reporting, these attacks are misconstrued half-truths. In fact, Sarah Palin has a large number of admirers who commend her for her persistent effort to improve the state of Alaska. Other admirers point to her unwavering support of the disabled population and her push for the interests of special-needs individuals, like those with autism and Down syndrome. Many more followers put their trust in Sarah Palin because she advocates for personal responsibility and financial freedom. Palin opposes the elimination of cash advances, a legitimate and invaluable resource because people have the right to financial freedoms and the right to choose to get a payday loan.
Post Courtesy of Personal Money Store
Professional Blogging Team
Feed Back: 1-866-641-3406
Home: http://personalmoneystore.com/NoFaxPaydayLoans.html
Blog: http://personalmoneystore.com/moneyblog/
By Danny Schechter
As millions of homes are foreclosed upon, as unemployment grows and inflation mounts, it is time to understand the origins of the crisis and the need to fight for economic justice.
Written by veteran media critic and Emmy winner Rory O'Connor, Shock Jocks features unsparing profiles of the ten worst conservative radio talkers in America, including Michael Savage, Bill O' Reilly, Rush Limbaugh, Don Imus and the rest.