HOME April 10, 2001
    A DECLARATION OF
MEDIA INDEPENDENCE

From "The More You Watch The Less You Know" (Seven Stories Press l997), by Danny Schechter

Two documents from historic and successful struggles for democracy have helped me frame my thinking on media independence. One was our own Declaration of Independence, the seminal statement of the American Revolution that gave the grievances of a colonized people eloquent expression. The other, from the modern era, was South Africa's Freedom Charter, adopted at a Congress of the People in l955, a clarion call for justice that outlined a vision and the principles for a post-apartheid society. Both documents defined in their times and lands what was wrong and pointed to what needed doing.

So, with a little creative borrowing, I drafted such a document for adoption at the 1996 Congress of Media and Democracy, which appeared in the Congress's final report. I include it here with no pretensions to literary originality, as a working draft for readers to react to, revise, and, hopefully, in part or in its entirety, to put to use.

We declare before our country and the world that the giant media combines who put profit before the public interest do not speak for us. We proclaim this democratic media charter and pledge ourselves to work tirelessly until its goals have been achieved. We urge all Americans of good will, and people throughout the world who want to participate in a new democratic information order to join with us.

We call upon our colleagues, readers, editors, and audiences to inform themselves and the American people about the dangers posed by the concentration of media power in fewer and fewer hands. We urge that more air time and news stories be devoted to a critical examination of the relationship between media monopolies and the threat they pose to the spirit and functioning of the first amendment. We cannot have a meaningful democracy unless our media institutions provide reportage, in-depth programming and coverage that reflects a more diverse range of sources and opinions.

We urge our elected representatives to challenge excessive and concentrated media power because it poses a threat to the future of democracy.

We call for an end to all legislation that promotes censorship and corporate practices that lead to self-censorship. We need government to regulate media monopolies in the public interest and to keep our news media and new electronic information highway open and free of the undue and repressive influence of government bureaucrats, excessive corporate branding, and one-note political agendas.

We urge non-governmental groups, advocacy organizations, labor unions, community groups, and all environmental and social justice organizations to make common cause with us in fighting to create more points of access and accountability in our media system; we urge all citizens to interact more with the media in their own communities by monitoring performance, writing letters, calling talk shows, and meeting editors and radio and TV executives.

We are against techno-solutions like the V Chip-and call instead for a "D Chip," a commitment to use media to promote the values of democracy. We want more than ritualized, look-alike and think-alike coverage of elections. We want more coverage of citizen participation in civil society, political movements, non-governmental organizations, and community groups. We share the concerns of many parents with the overload of shows that glamorize violence and cheapen sex.

We demand that media institutions in our society increase the participation of minorities and women in all positions in their organizations. Our newsrooms have to stop being among the most segregated institutions in our country. Racism inside the media contributes to the toleration of racism in the culture at large. We urge news organizations to openly audit their performance in this regard and publicize the results.

We further pledge to join and support efforts to stop attacks on labor unions in our media institutions. Media workers must be guaranteed the right to collective bargaining, and to belong to unions if they so choose.

We call on media companies to reduce the growing internal gap between salaries at the top and salaries at the bottom. Fairness and equity in the media workplace is essential.

We call upon media institutions to explore the values and practices of "public journalism" so that the media can begin to better serve the needs of the people. We urge them to adopt codes of conduct that rebuild their credibility in the eyes of a cynical public which no longer trusts the media. We call upon the media to promote tolerance and equality in American life.

We call upon U.S.-based multi-national media companies who already generate more than half of their revenues outside the United States to act responsibly in trading with the nations of the world. Many already resent the dumping of American programming, however popular it may be in the short run. Other countries deserve a chance to sell as well as buy, to have their voices and concerns heard too. They have the means of production but lack the means of distribution. We oppose the growth of a new "electronic colonialism." We want more global sharing of cultures and viewpoints.

We call upon the governments of the world to respect the rights of journalists-who are in danger in many countries-and the right of the people to read and see their reports.

We call for more public funding of the arts and humanities, including documentary programming. We want America to allocate as much money proportionately to support the arts and humanities as countries like Canada, Germany, and England do. We have the money, let us find the will.

We want to put the public back into public broadcasting and create mechanisms for accountability that bring PBS back to its original mandate to provide programming not available on the commercial spectrum. We want to stop the give-away of the public airwaves and the broadcast spectrum itself. The income from spectrum sales should be set aside for public media. The corporate media sector should be taxed to help subsidize public media so that the notion of the "free marketplace of ideas" has meaning once again. Private companies can lease the airwaves, not own them.

We pledge ourselves to working cooperatively and collaboratively to help bring the media more in line with the values of democracy.

We ask all who share our goals to embrace this declaration and agree to work on behalf of its tenets so that the principles of freedom of the press, which have given America such a distinctive place among nations, will not be compromised and denied because a handful of huge companies and media moguls are in a position to dictate what our country sees, hears, reads and, ultimately, thinks.

 

What's Your View? Speak Out in the MediaChannel Forum.

HOME

AS THE MEDIA WATCH THE WORLD, WE WATCH THE MEDIA.

The Media Channel is a not-for-profit project of OneWorld and The Global Center, and is produced by Globalvision New Media.

recommend this page!