|
By Danny Schechter MediaChannel.org
New York, June 1,
2006 — As events in Iraq continue to slip from bad to
worse, the good news brigade is scrambling for new stories— - ‘anything,
give me anything’ - to shore up what’s left of public
support for a bloody war without end.
As some feared and many predicted, the war hovers over our
politics and the president who “brought it on.”
He is, as the journalist Sid Blumenthal puts it, stuck in a
“paradigm” of his own making. The operative word
is the title and refrain of an early Springsteen song: “TRAPPED.”
Another tipping point seems to have tipped.
Fear and exhaustion are evident in our TV newsrooms, along
with a continuing failure to recognize what is going on. The
lack of insight is stunning; the quality of most of the news,
pathetic.
Even CBS’s brave Kimberly Dozier—may she fully
recover—was not only embedded in practice with the U.S.
military when she was wounded and her crew killed, but she seemed
embedded mentally, seeking out a ‘feel good’ story
to cheer the home front that the Bush Administration wants so
badly to stay the course of his “long war.”
In an e-mail sent to CBS, and only discovered after she went
from being an embed to being in a bed—at a military hospital
in Germany no less—she described the story she was going
to be doing before another IED did its awful damage.
‘The LA Times’ reported:
“When producers of the "CBS Evening News" arrived
in the newsroom Monday morning, there was an e-mail waiting
from correspondent Kimberly Dozier.
“In a note written Sunday night, she detailed a Memorial
Day story she planned to do about a U.S. soldier wounded in
Iraq who insisted on going back to the battlefield, a piece
about "fighting on in memory of those who have fallen."
What a tragic loss---TV journalists dying not in search of
deeper truths but to send back another picture-rich but patriotically
correct story along the same ‘good news’ lines as
one filed for ‘60 Minutes’ by CBS’s now chief
foreign correspondent Lara Logan. She glamorized the tactics
of a brainy American colonel heroically stopping terrorists
in the town of Tel Afar.
A ‘Washington Post’ journalist, filing a report
from the same town, debunked CBS’s storyline. He found
no terrorists killed in what was a sectarian and internal political
fight.
Early Thursday morning, the CNN website carried a story by
one of its Iraq reporters who realized after the fact that she
knew about the marines at Haditha but did not report on them
at the time.
"It actually took me a while to put all the pieces together
-- that I know these guys, the U.S. Marines at the heart of
the alleged massacre of Iraqi civilians in Haditha,” admits
reporter Arwa Damon.
When I went back to quote her more extensively a half-hour
later, the story was off the website and its URL did not work,
but I found it anyway through CNN’s website archive.
It’s a rare piece of media introspection.
“I don't know why it didn't register with me until now.
It was only after scrolling through the tapes that we shot in
Haditha last fall, and I found footage of some of the officers
that had been relieved of their command, that it hit me.
“I know the Marines that were operating in western al
Anbar, from Husayba all the way to Haditha. I went on countless
operations in 2005 up and down the Euphrates River Valley. I
was pinned on rooftops with them in Ubeydi for hours taking
incoming fire, and I've seen them not fire a shot back because
they did not have positive identification on a target.
(Note: the anguish of the U.S. military still tends to get
more airtime than the anguish of Iraqi civilians.)
Damon continues:
“I saw their horror when they thought that they finally
had identified their target, fired a tank round that went through
a wall and into a house filled with civilians. They then rushed
to help the wounded--remarkably no one was killed…
“And so began the e-mails and phone calls between myself
and my two other CNN crew members, Jennifer Eccleston and Gabe
Ramirez: Do you remember when we were talking with the battalion
commander and his intel guy right outside the school and then
half an hour later they found an IED in that spot? Do you remember
when we were sitting chatting with them at the school? And all
the other "do you remember whens."
“There was also -- can you believe it? -- the allegations
of the Haditha probe.”
“Can you believe it?” Yes, I can believe it. Haditha
is coming to light because conscientious marines spoke out and
then ex-marine Congressman John Murtha spoke out and then ‘TIME’
picked it up.
Our fearless TV journalists did not break the story.
CNN had it, but, according to Damon, didn’t realize it.
Journalists like Dahr Jamail have been calling attention to
many massacres that have gone mostly unreported—even when
U.S. journalists were there, like at Fallujah, which was played
up for its drama and gun battles, but never fully contextualized
or focused on the vast civilian casualties.
When atrocities occur, they are invariably described as “mistakes,”
rarely crimes. What this means is that many media organizations
are acting as accessories. War crimes often lead to media crimes
and vice versa.
England’s Media Lens discusses this same phenomenon in
the United Kingdom:
“U.S. defense secretary Donald Rumsfeld told US news
channels that the allegations are being investigated thoroughly
and would be handled "in the normal order of things.”
‘The Times’ (London) notes that "the damage
limitation has already begun." The paper explains: "Lawyers
who have talked to the Marines emphasize the extreme pressure
that they were facing that day. The insurgents had mounted a
wave of attacks, and the town was one of the most dangerous
in Iraq for US troops." (Ali Hamdani, Ned Parker, Nick
Meo and Tom Baldwin, ‘The Marines and a "massacre"
in Iraq,' The Times, May 27, 2006)
“Damage limitation includes shifting blame back on to
the Iraqis: ‘Marine officers have long been worried that
Iraq's deadly insurgency could prompt such a reaction by combat
teams.’ (Perry and Barnes, op. cit.)
Andrew Murray, chair of the Stop the War Coalition, said: "It's
clear that what happened in Haditha is a war crime. It would
be idle to think this is the first war crime that has been committed
in the last three years. It must be assumed that more of this
is going on." (Raymond Whitaker, 'The massacre and the
Marines,' Independent on Sunday, May 28, 2006)
So there you have the kind of discussion ignored in most of
the U.S. Press. While Press organizations stand by their colleagues—as
we should—they rarely call them and their news organizations
to account for what they do—and do not do.
The Bush Administration fears that the reaction to the gore
of the Haditha massacre will mark a turning point, not just
a tipping point, in support for the war. Let’s hope that
they are right.
— News Dissector Danny Schechter is "blogger in chief" of Mediachannel.org. His new books and film are listed at
at www.newsdissector.org/store.htm
Comments to Dissector@mediachannel.org
=
= = = = = =
SUBSCRIBE
to
Media Savvy, MediaChannel's free daily news update.
= = = = = = =
SUPPORT
MediaChannel's
2006 campaign by donating to MediaChannel.org
= = = = = = =
RETURN
to
MediaChannel's Homepage
= = = = = = =
|